About Us

Ecclesia Militans

What's New


Favorite Links

Bible and Prophecy

Catholic Prophecy

Guest Book Page

Old vs New


Traditional Dress

Siri Page


Death Blows to V-2




Since John 23rd dared to change the Canon and insert St. Joseph's name in the Communicantes, he was no pope.

Since Paul 6 changed the whole Liturgy, he also was no pope.

Since John Paul I went along with the changes, he was no pope.

Now, since John Paul 2 goes along with his 3 predecessors, he is also no pope.

We are not bound to follow those who deviate from Tradition nor are we bound to follow those bishops and priests who follow the 4.

"Whatsoever you shall bind on earth, shall be bound in heaven. And whatsoever you shall loose on earth, it shall be loosed in heaven." - Jesus Christ to the Apostles

Being as these changes were not bound on the Faithful because they deviated from Tradition, they certainly were not bound in heaven. Some would say they were "loosed", yet previous POPES have already decreed and bound.

Quo Primum of Pope St. Pius V, for example, bound all Faithful to the Mass of the Council of Trent forever. To say he was in error is to say the Church was in error, Christ was in error which is heresy and blasphemous. For almost 2,000 years, the Mass was offered in Perfection. Then comes along a council to change things of the Church. There was no authorization to do so, nor was it bound on all Faithful to follow. Execrabilis by Pope Pius II destroys what Vatican 2 has done and All Faithful should adhere to Execrabilis Decrees.

St. Paul told Catholics to "hold to tradition" (2Thess.). This is Divine Tradition handed down through generations. Vatican 2 and its 4 fake pontiffs broke from Tradition, and established traditions of men spoken against by St. Paul in Corinthians.

Roncalli (aka John 23rd), Montini (aka Paul 6), Luciani (aka John Paul 1), and Wojtyla (aka John Paul 2) do not, and never had, jurisdiction on Catholics at all. Theirs is a new church formed by Protestant ministers and Zionist-Masonic-Jew "Progressives", "Evolutionists", who, like their ancestors before the Inquisitions, infiltrated the seminaries or became baptized in order to subvert everything of the Church to their liking so that they dare attempt to eliminate (physically) their guilt, their curses upon themselves. "Let His blood be upon us and our children". They despise the Blood of Christ, therefore they eliminated the Feast of the Precious Blood of our Savior. This, they think, absolves them from their guilt. Was it bound on earth and in heaven that Judas Iscariot is absolved from hell?

The new 42-year-old church is an evolving church. Everything must change continuously because it is "evolving". Not one truth will be left in it. It is all a big Lie. "You are of your father the devil, and his works you WILL DO." St. John 8:44

False ecumenism (all religions one, as "John Paul 2" promotes) vs. the Church Ecumenical (all Catholic Churches united as One) is building the Tower of Babel as Scriptures prophecied for these later times.

The New "Mass" is the Tower of Babel's satanic ritual, because the altar was replaced by a Masonic altar (table), a Cranmer (Protestant) table, and so-called "prayers" and "hymns" are of JewishProtestant design. All of it is Lucifer's prideful design to be God and above Him. We know what happened to Lucifer.

John Paul 2's Buddha "Mass"
Have previous Popes from Pius XII to St. Peter ever allowed any pagan to place their statue on top of where our Lord Jesus resides in the Tabernacle? Never!

John Paul 2's heretic "Mass" of pagan indians.
Have any popes prior to John 23rd Ever offered Mass other than what Christ established? NEVER!
6 Protestant ministers with Paul 6 who helped design the New "Mass" to Their liking
Did any previous council before Vatican 2 ever ask for help from heretics and schismatics? No, NEVER!
Paul 6 wearing the breastplate of Caiphas, Jewish high priest, who condemned our Lord Jesus to Death
Has any Pope prior to 1959 ever worn any Jewish garb? NO! NEVER!
The above picture of Paul 6 proves that Jesus Christ is persecuted once again by Jews who have eliminated Him in that new church of Antichrist.
Paul 6 clearly shows that he is against Jesus Christ just as Caiphas was who condemned Jesus along with all the Pharisees and their followers. Paul 6 clearly murdered Christ in his "Church" for the good of the Jews. There is no doubt Paul 6 was a marrano as were his predecessor and successors.

Paul VI wore the Ephod of a Jewish High Priest with, and often without, his pectoral cross. And according to the Jesuit Father Joaquin Saenz y. Arriaga, doctor of Theology, Church History, and Canon Law, Montini was of Jewish origin as noted in the prestigious Blue Book of prominent families in Italy.

He put Cardinal Gregory Baum of St. Louis, Missouri, a Jewish 'convert' in charge of textbooks worldwide. Baum has made sure that all textbooks used by Catholic children have been gutted of any negative references to anything Jewish, replacing them with glowing accolades.

Closing Vatican II he sought to bind all the Faithful to its decrees and then proceeded to introduce a new mass, new sacraments including a new rite of ordination, and new religious books in the schools. As if Jesus Christ's doctrines could be changed. They cannot.
We await the Fleur De Lis, the Holy Pope, the white lily (above) and his Holy Monarch
St. Caesar, 5th Century: "He shall recover the Crown of the Lilies....." (picture of crown, Papal tiara on right)

St. Hildegarde, German Abbess, 12th Century: "The White Flower again takes possession of the Throne of France."

Bishop Ageda, 12th Century: "He shall inherit the Crown of the Fleur-de-Lis"

St. Francis de Paola (15th Century): "(He and the Holy Pontiff) shall obtain dominion over the whole world.
Paul 6 shaking hands with an enemy of the Church. What does that make Paul 6? An enemy, of course!
Notice the Masonic grip. Has any Pope prior to Vatican 2 ever shaken hands with the enemies of the Church? NEVER!
Paul 6 replacing the papal tiara with a mere bishop's mitre
It is so obvious what Montini wanted to convey here - the end of all Tradition. No longer a king in Rome, no longer represent the King of kings. So, who did Montini represent?
Cardinal Giuseppe Siri who was elected Pope, Gregory XVII, in 1958 (photo below left)
In the pontificate of Pope Pius XII, Cardinal Guiseppe Siri (1906-1989) had been a prodigy, becoming bishop in 1944 and cardinal in 1953. He was said to have been Pius' designated successor, and fought a rude battle with Angelo Roncalli (later John XXIII) in the 1958 conclave. Various hostile groups such as the World Jewish Congress and B'nai Brith (the Masonic lodge for Jews) carried on a covert campaign for Roncalli. In the case of the Conclaves of John XXIII (1958) and of Paul VI (1963), there were communications (with the exterior). It is thus known that there were several ballots during which, in the first [Conclave], a conservative bloc was actually successful in electing Siri on the fourth ballot of the first day of the conclave, October 26, 1958.

Overwhelmingly convinced of the God's plan by the unified vote of the electors, Cardinal Siri accepted office, announced his desire to be known as Pope Gregory XVII, and began to prepare to receive the first obeisances of the cardinals. Then, a shrill storm of protest was heard from the reformers, who jumped to their feet to intimidate the new Pope with the threat that they would immediately establish an international schismatic church, were he to emerge from the conclave as pope. Badly shaken, Siri is supposed to have replied: "if you do not want me, then elect someone else" This statement was taken as his abdication. He capitulated to the conclave mutineers who, having just promoted his unanimous, canonical election, brutally shoved him aside within five minutes, so as to proceed with a second, invalid election of the Masonic agent Angelo Roncalli, two days later.

Hoping to avoid a global, bloody persecution of the Church at any price, Siri did not foresee that he had expedited an alternative and far more terrible spiritual persecution of the Church, which would take the form of the dreaded, heretical Second Vatican Council, convened by antipope John XXIII and ratified by antipope Paul VI. This had been the enemy's principal goal all along, in order to give the appearance that the errors of the French Revolution were finally to be 'consecrated' from the pinnacle of power within the Church's visible structures. This step was absolutely necessary to the 'powers of Darkness', so that they could place Masonic agents upon the Chair of Peter. Thus the Catholic Church's ancient enemies had pulled off a 'coup d'etat' inside the headquarters of the Church's government with Siri reduced to a helpless bystander.

After Siri's fourth ballot majority vote the aged Cardinal Tedeschini was elected (according to the 1976 letter of Peter Scortesco; and Corriere della Sera Newspaper, Milan, 27 October 1958). The Masonic masterminds of the 1958 Conclave had no intention of conducting a fair election with Tedeschini publicly emerging as a 'transitional' pope. But his candidacy would be useful to them if it could be sold to the conservatives as a more practical substitute to any attempt to elect Siri a second time. The evidence suggests that the scheme worked. When the old cardinal was elected, his acceptance of the office was instantly quashed, thus demonstrating to the conservative block the reformers' ability to obstruct any candidate they opposed by whatever means available. (It is reasonable to presume that this was accomplished by threats of violence, secretively delivered to Tedeschini and some of his electors, as such a method would later be used against Siri in 1963).

Once Tedeschini was sidelined, the Pacellian alliance was routed, and the conclave, which continued its search for a 'transitional' pope was manoeuvred toward a 'compromise' with Roncalli. By the end of the third day of balloting, the elderly cardinals were exhausted and confused and some were perhaps even frightened, such that a sufficient number had finally capitulated, giving Roncalli the necessary majority.

Cardinal Siri did not like Roncalli aka John XXIII who initiated the Second Vatican Council. He once said that 'it will take the Church fifty years to recover from his pontificate.' He did not like Montini aka Paul VI, who completed the Second Vatican Council, an event described by Siri as 'the greatest disaster in recent ecclesiastical history' and by 'recent' he meant in the last five hundred years. He termed Vatican II 'the greatest mistake in history' (Runaway Church, Seabury, 1975. p. 10)

During his Nunciature in Turkey, Angelo Roncalli was admitted 'into the sect of the Temple' receiving the name 'Brother John' -- (Pier Carpi, Prophesies of John XXIII, p. 52). 'I know Cardinal Roncalli very well. He was a Deist and a Rationalist whose strength did not lie in the ability to believe in miracles and to venerate the sacred', wrote high ranking Freemason, Carl Jakob Burckhardt, in Journal De Geneve (quoted by Carpi). 'The direction of our action: Continuation of the Work of John XXIII and all those who have followed him on the way to the Templar universalisme' (Resurgence de Temple, p. 149 -- a book edited by the Templars themselves in 1975).

During his Nunciature in Paris, Roncalli attended in civilian clothes the Great Lodge where he again met the Jesuit Riquet [who attracted notice since the Second World War as a result of his campaigns in favor of Jewish and Masonic circles with which he has direct contacts, having lectured at the Volnay de Laval Lodge at the invitation of its Worshipful Master, Marius Lepage, who was at the forefront of moves to obtain from the Vatican a reappraisal of the church's traditional attitude towards Freemasonry and the cancellation of the condemnations pronounced against it]. Riquet's adviser was Maurice Bredet, author of 'Mystic and Magic,' who boasted that he had prophesied the Tiara to Cardinal Roncalli' (The Hidden, But Victorious Way Of The Free-Masonry, Rev. Fr. Henri Mouraux).

In 1958, reflecting the bravado of Jewish boastfulness, Roncalli took the name John XXIII, the same name adopted by the antipope Baldasar Cosa, who usurped the papal office. Traditionally one never takes the name of an antipope unless it is to right the wrong done by the former antipope.

When Nuncio to France he appointed a 33 Degree Freemason and close friend, the Baron Yves Marsaudon, head of the French Branch of the Knights of Malta, causing a major scandal for the Pacelli papacy. (Paul I. Murphy and R. Rene Arlington, La Popessa, 1983, pp. 332-333). As Yves Marsaudon would later gloat: 'If there are still some remnants of thought, reminiscent of the Inquisition, they will be drowned in a rising flood of ecumenism and liberalism. One of the most tangible consequences will be the lowering of spiritual barriers that divide the world. With all our hearts we wish for the success of John XXIII's Revolution' (Yves Marsaudon, L'oecumenisme vu par un Franc Macon de Tradition, 1964, Paris, p. 26).

The dedication and preface for Marsaudon's book was written by Charles Riandley, Sovereign Grand Commander of the Supreme Council of France (Scottish Rite). Riandley wrote: 'To the memory of Angelo Roncalli, . . Pope under the Name of John XXIII, Who Has Deigned to Give Us His Benediction, His Understanding and His Protection, . . [and] To His August Continuer, His Holiness Pope Paul VI.' Riandley confidently predicted how the policies of Roncalli and Montini would advance the Masonic agenda: 'We are convinced of the narrowness of the spiritual, cultural, scientific, social and economic structures which up to our own time, have hindered the actions and the thoughts of man. . . But these structures have already been shattered in part. Some pontifical decisions have contributed to this. We feel sure that they will be all destroyed eventually. . . True, not everything is to be rejected; but what cannot be saved will not be saved unless it is renovated'" (L'oecumenisme vu par un Franc Macon de Tradition, Yves Marsaudon, 1964, Paris, p. 15-16).

When elevated to the College of Cardinals Roncalli insisted upon receiving the red hat from the notoriously anti-clerical Vincent Auriol, President of the Masonic 'Fourth Republic' of France, kneeling before him to have the red hat placed upon his head.

At social functions in Paris Roncalli was frequently seen fraternising with the Soviet Ambassador, M. Bogomolov, even though the Soviet Union had resumed its pre-war policy of brutal extermination of Catholics in Russia. He was also a good friend of Edouard Herriot, Secretary of the anti-Catholic Radical Socialists (of France)" (Rev. Francis X. Murphy, C.S.S.R., John XXIII Comes To The Vatican, 1959, p. 139).

The Holy Office had kept a file on Roncalli since 1925, wherein it stated, 'suspected of Modernism'. In 1925, Roncalli, who was known for his unorthodox teachings, was abruptly removed from his professorship at the Lateran Seminary in mid-semester and shipped off to Bulgaria, thus beginning his diplomatic career. Of particular concern to the Holy Office had been his continuing close association with the defrocked priest, Ernesto Buonaiuti, who was excommunicated for heresy in 1926 (Lawrence Elliott, I Will Be Called John, 1973, pp. 90-92). Following Roncalli's election he summoned the conclavists back to the Sistine Chapel for an unusual overnight post-election session, politely threatening excommunication for noncompliance. His principle use of the assemblage was to renew stern warnings against any breach of conclave secrecy (lest some suspicious details might leak out, exposing the irregular events to the public).

John XXII made Giovanni Baptiste Montini a cardinal, something Pope Pius XII refused to do after it was found that Montini had been secretly communicating with Stalin during World War II. Making Montini a Cardinal positioned him to become Pope Paul VI which was apparently the game-plan all along, as suggested by LIFE Magazine's promotion of Montini for Pope in 1956 when he was still only a bishop.

In the second [Conclave of 1963], Cardinal Siri was again elected. . . . [with] only one more vote than Montini, [he] had the imprudence to ask that his election be again voted, so that he could reign with a more important majority. And it was then [during the noon recess following the second scrutiny] that Cardinal Tisserant went out to telephone, and when he returned, Cardinals Lienart, Konig, Dopfner and Tarancon [changed their ballots and then] voted for Montini who took the name Paul VI [in the scrutinies which followed]. And it was known that these four had relations with the Freemasons. Therefore, one can affirm, without mistake, that Paul VI was elected from that sect" (Introibo Newsletter No. 61, July-August-September, 1988, Association Noel Pinot, Angers, France, p. 3). As will be seen in the quotes concerning the 1963 Conclave, those with whom Tisserant communicated were the B'nai B'rith.

At his coronation as Paul VI, several American newspapers accused him of being a member of B'nai B'rith Masonic Lodge of the 'Jew's' Anti Defamation League -- accompanied by a photograph as proof" (Rev. Fr. Henri Mouraux, The Hidden, but Victorious Way of the Free-Masonry).

Paul VI was known in his seminary days as a notorious homosexual, who wormed his way to high office in the Vatican. In 1954 Pope Pius XII banished him from Rome without the red hat after learning that Montini had betrayed into the hands of Stalin the secret identities of the clandestine Bishops in Russia, causing their arrest and execution. Known as 'the Red Pope', he was greeted on the balcony after his 'election' with cries of 'il Papa Montinovsky'. 30 Days magazine reported in its November 3, 1993 edition, the election of Cardinal Montini to the Chair of Peter as Paul VI was engineered by a large group of Masonic and Modernist cardinals meeting in the home of a leading Freemason, Umberto Ortolani, just prior to the conclave. Just days before his death Paul VI made a prominent Roman Freemason, Umberto Ortolani, a 'Gentleman of His Holiness' a much coveted title reserved for the patrician elite amongst Catholics. It was a sign that John XXIII did not repent of his Masonic affiliations, even on his death bed ("A John XXIII Update", an article in 30-Days Magazine, November 2, 1994).

Carlos Vazquez Rangel, Grand Commander of the Supreme Council of the Masons of Mexico, in a 1993 interview with the political weekly 'Processo' stated: "On the same day, in Paris the profane Angelo Roncalli (Pope John XXIII) and the profane Giovanni Montini (Pope Paul VI) were initiated into the august mysteries of the Brotherhood. Thus it was that much that was achieved at the Council (Vatican II) was based on Masonic principles."

n his 1964 book, "L'oecumenisme vu par un Franc Macon de Tradition" (Ecumenism As Seen By A French Freemason), Yves Marsaudon stated: 'The sense of universalism that is rampant in Rome these days is very close to our purpose for existence. Thus we are unable to ignore the Second Vatican Council and its consequences . . . With all our hearts we support the Revolution of John XXIII . . . This courageous concept of the Freedom of Thought that lies at the core of our Freemasonic lodges, has spread in a truly magnificent manner right under the Dome of St. Peter's.'

Elsewhere he writes: 'Born in our Masonic Lodges, freedom of expression has now spread beautifully over the Dome of St. Peter's . . . This is the Revolution of Paul VI. It is clear that Paul VI, not content merely to follow the policy of his predecessor, does in fact intend to go much further. . .'

When Marxist Paul VI (while shaking hands with Communists at the Vatican, many of our priests, nuns, monks, and laity were being slaughtered in Communist lands) learned how the US cardinals were mobilized against his pontificate which had become the target of CIA-funded black propaganda, he elevated left-wing prelates to higher office. Most of these 'progressive cardinals' came from the Third World, where Liberation Theology flourished. The CIA, US State Department, and National Security Council and US clerical mafia of the likes of Cardinal Cody sponsored a plot to have Cardinal Karol Wojtyla of Poland elected as Paul's successor. But their plot was foiled when the other cardinals became suspicious of US interference.

Jean Guitton, a distinguished French writer as well as the great friend and confidant of Paul VI, recently described His "intention with regard to the liturgy . . . (which) was to reform the Catholic liturgy in such a way that it should almost coincide with the Protestant liturgy . . . beyond the Council of Trent, (and) closer to the Protestant Lord's Supper . . . (making) less room for all that some would call 'magic,' (namely) . . . transubstantial consecration, and for all that is of the Catholic Faith; . . . there was with Paul VI an ecumenical intention to remove . . . what was too Catholic, in the traditional sense, in the Mass, and, I repeat, to get the Catholic Mass closer to the Calvinist mass" (Broadcast December 19, 1993 by Radio-Courtoisie, Paris).

At the time of Vatican II Brother Branham said, ". . . the only thing in the diocese that stops Catholicism and Protestantism from uniting is the order of communion." (William Branham, The Stature of A Perfect Man, 50:374). Thus, the very words of Jesus were changed.

The Unforgiveable Sin
According to Jewish sources (Dagobert Runes, The War Against the Jew), just prior to his death, Roncalli was preparing to make a Prayer of Reparation to the 'Jews', which denies the Church and applauds the 'Jews', a mandate for all Catholics. It states:

'We admit that over hundreds of years our eyes were blinded, so as not to see the Beauty of Thy Chosen People and not to recognize the features of our firstborn brother. We admit that the sign of Cain is upon our forehead. For centuries Abel was lying in blood and tears while we had forgotten Thy love. Forgive us, O Lord, the curse we unjustly spoke out over the people of Israel. Forgive us, that in their flesh we crucified You the second time! We did not know what we were doing.'

Ecumenism at its worst
"Patriarch" Raphael I of Babylon of the Chaldeans in Iraq, in an interview with Fides says: "On May 14th I was received by the Pope, together with a delegation composed of the Shiite imam of Khadum mosque and the Sunni President of the council of administration of the Iraqi Islamic Bank At the end of the audience the Pope bowed to the Muslim holy book the Koran presented to him by the delegation and he kissed it as a sign of respect. The photo of that gesture has been shown repeatedly on Iraqi television and it demonstrates that the Pope is not only aware of the suffering of the Iraqi people, he has also great respect for Islam."(Fides news agency, Rome, 4 June 1999)

A Manifest Heretic Cannot be Pope
St Robert Bellarmine: "It is proven with arguments from authority and from reason that the manifest heretic is ipso facto deposed... which means before any excommunication or judicial sentence... therefore the manifest heretic cannot be pope... A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically ceases to be pope and head of the Church, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church." (De Romano Pontifice, II: 30.)

St. Antoninus (1459) "In the case of the pope becoming a heretic, he would find himself, by that fact alone and without any other sentence, separated from the Church.... A pope who would be separated from the Church by heresy, therefore, would by that very fact itself cease to be head of the Church. He could not be a heretic and remain pope, because, since he is outside of the Church, he cannot possess the keys of the Church." (Summa Theologica, cited in Actes de Vatican I. V. Frond pub.)

St. Francis de Sales (1567-1622) "Now when [the Pope] is explicitly a heretic, he falls ipso facto from his dignity and out of the Church..." (The Catholic Controversy, TAN Books, pg. 306.)

St. Alphonsus Maria De Liguori (1787) "If ever a pope, as a private person, fell into heresy, he would at once fall from the pontificate." (Oeuvres Completes. 9:232)

Pope Innocent III (1198) "The Roman Pontiff has no superior but God. Who, therefore (should a pope 'lose his savor') could cast him out or trample him under foot - since of the pope it is said 'gather thy flock into thy fold'? Truly, he should not flatter himself about his power, nor should he rashly glory in his honor and high estate, because the less he is judged by man, the more he is judged by God. Still the less can the Roman Pontiff glory because he can be judged by men, or rather, can be shown to be already judged, if for example he should wither away into heresy; because he who does not believe is already judged. In such a case it should be said of him: If salt should lose its savor, it is good for nothing but to be cast out and trampled under foot by men." (Sermon 4)

Pope Paul IV, Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio, 1559: Ex Cathedra "We declare that if ever a… sovereign Pope, had, before their elevation to the Cardinalate or Pontificate, deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy, the promotion or elevation - even if it had taken place with the unanimous assent of the Cardinals - is invalid and null."

1917 Code of Canon Law: "C. 188. 4. There are certain causes which effect the tacit resignation of an office, which resignation is accepted in advance by operation of law, and hence is effective without any declaration. These causes are: ... (4) if he has publicly defected (fallen away) from the Catholic faith."
John Paul 2 getting the MARK of SHIVA
Some cry "The girl in the picture is Catholic!" Then the girl is automatically excommunicated along with John Paul 2 for engaging in pagan rituals! De Fide!
Pope Pius XII said that the Message of Fatima was "a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith and [the] liturgy."
Pope Saint Pius X's Encyclical warned about the Modernists who did indeed take over the Vatican, those "Progressive" marrano Jews, those "evolutionists", and destroyers of everything of Jesus Christ. His prophetic vision of seeing one of his successors being trampled. That would have been Pope Gregory XVII (Cardinal Siri).