|
"Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of the Antichrist" - Our Lady at LaSalette
DEATH BLOWS TO VATICAN COUNCIL II
by The Veritas Staff
Printed and bound in the USA 1979
VERITAS
P.O. Box 1605
Louisville, Kentucky 40201
http://www.veritas3.homestead.com/
CONTENTS
Introduction
Origin of Execrabilis
What Execrabilis Says and Does
Vatican I
Death Blows by Vatican I
Four Important Features
Vatican Council II
Price of Updating
Canon 58 (4th Toledo Council)
Acts Favoring Jewry
V-2 Counter-Attack
Bulla of Pope Paul IV
Codex
Our Stand
God's Stand
Appendix (Bulla of Paul IV)
INTRODUCTION
How is it possible for V-2 (the Second Vatican Council) to be allowed any credence or given obedience by the bishops throughout the world? It is past understanding how prelates of the Catholic Church could accept acts and teachings proposed by V-2 that are completely counter to all that Christ entrusted to His Church.
It has happened because the clergymen of today have lost touch with the Apostolic knowledge, the Apostolic zeal, and the Apostolic vigilance. Love for the Apostolic Tradition, love for the Word of God have been lost. The result? Today we have priests who no longer hold love for the teachings of the Catholic Church nor zeal for Her truths. They lack respect for Her Judgments, now trodden underfoot.
Having lost the Apostolic knowledge of the Word of God, the hierarchy join with the enemies of the Apostolic Church in suppressing Her Primacy and Sovereignty. Devoid of the Apostolic knowledge, they no longer accept the Catholic Apostolic Religion as Divine and the only religion God gave to mankind. They no longer believe that the Catholic Religion has rights others do not. Nor do the clergy know any more that man is bound in conscience to accept and believe this one Divine Religion - and no other.
There is a price to be paid by those who deny the Apostolic Church Her Primacy and Sovereignty. To those who dare dispute or attack the Word of God or the divinely-instituted interpreter and teacher of this Word, there is a punishment inflicted.
This booklet, dealing principally with the V-2 Council that was illegally brought into being to loose the Church from Her Primacy and Sovereignty, and to war against the decrees and judgments of Christ and His Church, spells out the punishment meted to those who tamper with the Word of God and the safeguarding Judgments of His Church.
That men of the cloth could be calloused and insensitive to the terrifying punishments imposed by Christ's Church is incomprehensible. One can only suppose it is but another consequence of their lack of the Apostolic knowledge.
DEATH BLOWS TO V-2
It seldom fails. Whenever new subscribers to Veritas, especially priests, read about Execrabilis for the first time, they are overjoyed to know of its existence, delightfully surprised to discover that the Church has such a formidable weapon for striking death blows against Her enemies. More often than not, a priest will hasten to the nearest library to see for himself.
ORIGIN OF EXECRABILIS
Why was the Church moved to issue this far-reaching Papal Bulla back in 1460? By the special assistance of the Holy Ghost, permitting the supernatural gift of prudence to play a decisive part, Pope Pius II exercised this means of condemning the error of "conciliarism" so rampant in his day.
After the death of Pope Boniface VIII in 1303 the enemies of Christ, inside and outside His Church, tried to escape from the Church's teachings, handed down through the Apostolic Pontiffs, by seeking appeals from papal pronouncements and policies to that of a general Council of the whole Church, bypassing the Pope if necessary, or victimizing him as they attempted with Martin V in 1414. This contemptuous, arrogant attitude came to be known as the "Conciliarist usurpation of the papal power by a Council."
Clearly, "conciliarism" is an imminent danger for the Church, the papacy and divine doctrine in any age. Relying upon the error of "conciliarism," kings and clergy became defiant to the Holy See, threatening to appeal to future Councils and to future Popes in the hopes of changing Church doctrine or policy In furtherance of this practice, special groups sought to place men of their own anti-Catholic thinking on the Throne of Peter.
Then, in 1458, Pius II came to the Throne, himself indoctrinated with the "Conciliarist" attitude. However, once seated on the Papal Throne, he realized the evil of appealing to a future Council whether for the expressed or secret purpose of overturning Church Tradition and the Deposit of Faith. So serious had matters worsened that by 1460 Pius II felt impelled to issue his now-famous Bulla, Execrabilis, on February 15th of that year, outlawing this harmful maneuver and binding it with two of the severest punishments the Church may inflict.
In Execrabilis he laid down definite Church Law to protect the Church, the Faith and the sheepfold from illegal Councils, not only in his time but in all time to come.
This papal pronouncement, this Church teaching, has the grace of infallibility since it relates specifically to Faith and Morals; Moreover, it can never be revoked or rendered inoperative or null and void. Pope Pius II, in obedience to his solemn and paramount duty to protect the Faith and Morals of the Faithful, equipped the Apostolic Church with this potent weapon to combat illegal councils, to deal death blows to them.
In justice, we Apostolic Catholics of today must use this weapon against the illegal 2nd Vatican Council, an evil council called to escape Christ's divine doctrine, His Church's teachings and practices; a satanic council called to "liberate" mankind from the past judgments of the Holy See, the binding judgments of the Keys of Peter. We must use Execrabilis to beat to death the abominable, detestable, execrable V-2 Council that dared to reopen the infallible judgments of Christ's Church, in violation of divine precepts and laws prohibiting this anti-Catholic act.
Rarely do you find an infallible pronouncement so brief yet so all-embracing and all-binding as is Execrabilis. So concise is Execrabilis that one is apt to miss the import of its sweeping message, overlook its significance, on first reading.
So disastrous is the effect of Execrabilis upon the V-2 Council that the very knowledge of its existence by awakening Catholics who oppose V-2 sent stirring volcanic shakes and shivers through Paul 6, mastermind and implementor-in-chief of this anti-supernatural V-2 Council. So terrified of Execrabilis was Paul 6, as are his lackeys today, they busied themselves fashioning arguments against the definite and final judgment of Execrabilis in a vain effort to escape its quashing effects on their perfidious V-2 Council. One can say Execrabilis is the ecclesial broom that sweeps the Church clean of the sinful works of an illegal Council. As an unruly dog is frightened and put to rout by a broom or mop wielded in the hands of the conscientious mother of a household, so too the refractory whelps of V-2 are terrified by Execrabilis in the hands of Holy Mother Church.
WHAT EXECRABILIS SAYS AND DOES
Here is the text of Execrabilis forbidding all appeals to a future Council:
"1. An execrable, and in former ages unheard-of-abuse, has sprung up in our time, namely that some people, imbued with the spirit of rebellion, presume to appeal to a future Council, from the Roman Pontiff, the Vicar of Jesus Christ, to whom it was said in the person of blessed Peter: "Feed my sheep" and "Whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound also in Heaven"; they do not do so because they are anxious to obtain sounder judgment, but in order to escape the consequences of their sins, and anyone who is not ignorant of the laws can realize how contrary this is to the sacred canons and how detrimental to the Christian community. Because - passing over other things which are most manifestly opposed to this corruption - who would not find it ridiculous when appeals are made to what does not exist and the time of whose future existence nobody knows? The poor are oppressed in many ways by the stronger, crimes remain unpunished, freedom is conceded to delinquents, and all the ecclesiastical discipline and hierarchal order is confounded.
2. Wishing therefore to thrust away from Christ's Church this pestilent venom, to take care of the salvation of all those who have been committed to us, and to hold off from the sheepfold of our Saviour all cause of scandal, we condemn appeals of this kind by the counsel of all prelates and juris-consults of Divine and human law adhering to the Curia and on the ground of our sure knowledge; we denounce them as erroneous and detestable, quash and entirely annul them in the event that any such appeals, extant at present, may be discovered, and we declare and determine that they are - like something void and pestilent - of no significance. Consequently, we enjoin that nobody dares under whatever pretext to make such an appeal from any of our ordinances, sentences or commands and from those of our successors, or to adhere to such appeals, made by others, or to use them in any manner.
3. If any one, of whatever status, rank, order or condition he may be, even if adorned with imperial, royal or Papal dignity, shall contravene this after the space of two months from the day of the publication of this Bull by the Apostolic Chancery, he shall ipso facto incur sentence of anathema, from which he can not be absolved except by the Roman Pontiff and at the point of death. A University or a corporation shall be subjected to an ecclesiastical interdict; nonetheless, corporations and Universities, like the aforesaid and any other persons, shall incur those penalties and censures which offenders who have committed the crimen laesae maiestatis and promoters of heretical depravity are known to incur. Furthermore, scriveners and witnesses who shall witness acts of this kind and, in general, all those who shall knowingly furnish counsel, help or favour to such appealers, shall be punished with the same penalty.
Therefore, it is not allowed to any man to infringe or to oppose by audacious perversion this charter of our will, by which we have condemned, reproved, quashed, annulled, decreed, declared and ordered the aforesaid. If any one, however, shall so attempt, let him know that he shall incur the indignation of Almighty God and of Saint Peter and Paul, His Apostles.
Given at Mantua, in the year 1460 of the Lord's Incarnation, on the fifteenth day before the Kalends of February, in the second year of our Pontificate."
"TO OBTAIN SOUNDER JUDGMENT"
To give an example of how easily one might miss the significance of Execrabilis, take the phrase " ... they are anxious to obtain sounder judgment." Here we see that the purpose of appealing to an illegal council is to escape the past judgment of the Holy See. But Execrabilis cuts the villains off at the pass, saying a council may not be used to reopen Judgments. Execrabilis tells us that once the Church has made a Judgment, it may not be questioned by councils or future popes. Once the Church has spoken, She has spoken finally and forever.
There can be no sounder judgment than an infallible pronouncement on Faith and Morals, which infallible Judgment no Council may break and the V-2 Council, due to its illegality, was powerless to make. The Church never corrects Herself, for She never makes errors in Faith or Morals. With Christ as Her Head and the Holy Ghost as Her Guide there can be no need to perfect or reopen Her Judgments.
Yet, it was and is the purpose of V-2 (a non-dogmatic council) to reopen and question the past Judgments of the One Holy Catholic Apostolic Church. Therefore, the calling of the V-2 Council to reopen the Judgments of the Church makes V-2 an illegal council quashed and made null and void by Church Law. The Church has thrust Her Sword of Infallible Truth into the evil heart of the V-2 Council, giving it the death blow 500 hundred years before V-2 raised its serpentine head.
CONCILIARIST ERRORS IN LATER CENTURIES
The conciliarist heresy (the idea of using a council to reopen infallible judgments), courageously faced and legislated against in the 15th century by Pope Pius II, re-emerged in later ages, notably in the 19th century at Council Vatican I, and reappeared again in the 20th century following the death of Pope Pius XII.
VATICAN I
Some four-hundred years after Execrabilis, the First Vatican Council (1869-70), a holy dogmatic Council, deemed it expedient to amplify and reaffirm the law laid down in Execrabilis.
Back in 1869, in their efforts to destroy the Kingdom of God on earth, the Catholic Church, Her enemies fastened upon the finality of Church pronouncements, seeking to disprove belief in their infallibility and permanence.
History tells us that Vatican I was called to define Papal Infallibility but few books today tell us why the question of infallibility had become so burning and vital an issue.
Plainly, there were two factions at work: one for infallibility; the other wanted to see past Church Judgments reopened and changed or obliterated. Even as today, the one side was made up of loyal Apostolic Catholics; the other side comprised the Marranos and their followers, many of whom were confused and duped - as were many of the bishops at Vatican II - duped into believing the Church's judgments could be obliterated or modified.
The issue seized upon by the Marranos at V-1 would be the same wedge they used at V-2: a new and different Church stand on the Jews. They wanted a different attitude and thinking from Catholics on the Jews than what the Church has always held and taught. They wanted an acceptance of rabbinic talmudic Judaism as a religion in its own right, higher and even better than Christianity.
In 1869-70 the Jews wanted to be exonerated of deicide and wanted the lifting of the Curse of God which their wickedness brought upon their race. Once this door was open to them, there would be no bar to the Synagogue of Satan bringing into the Church all of its bags of false gnostic doctrines, as was later to happen at the V-2 Council (1962-65).
In 1869-70 the Marrano-enemy sought to achieve his goal by trickery - inducing the prelates at the V-1 Council to approve declarations directly opposed to what the Church has previously declared. In short, to contradict Herself. This would amount to reopening the whole sum of Her past infallible judgments which are irreformable. What the Marranos had in mind, of course, was the destruction of the whole Deposit-of-Faith, the stripping of the Catholic Church, Her demise.
Marrano Maneuver: - For getting their way at the V-1 Council, the Marranos had devised a clever maneuver. Perhaps you've heard the story of the lady who was stopped on the street corner by a salesman and offered the opportunity to buy a mink coat cheap. He shows her a real mink coat, she pays her money and receives a box. Upon arriving home and opening the box she finds not a soft, luxurious mink coat but one of prickly opossum.
Such was the old bait and switcheroo game the Marranos tried at V-1. First the Jews approached the Council Fathers with a proposal that they sign a "summons to conversion of the Israelites," which is an intention without fault. It should happen! But later, the Jews added assertions, the same old heretical lies they always propose, which stand in open contradiction to the doctrine laid down in this respect by the Holy Catholic Church (Pinay, Plot Against the Church, pp. 18-19).
The Franco-Prussian War and Papal Infallibility happened to be declared the same week. In spite of the horrors and gathering darkness of war, Pius IX had only one concern, the welfare of the Universal Church. He did not terminate V-1 until a re- declaration of Papal Infallibility on faith and morals was settled once and for all time. This infallible pronouncement means that past Church judgments are irreformable, never to be reopened ever. Thus, none may alter the permanent traditional infallible doctrines of the Church in any age.
And God knows Pius IX had a difficult time in getting the full support of the majority of bishops to commit themselves to the Church's traditional and constant doctrine of infallibility. It wasn't that the prelates were against infallibility but they showed signs of uncertainty as to when and how this doctrine applied. They did not understand the importance in 1869-70 of urgency for re-declaring this dogma that had already been recognized at the Councils of Lyons and Florence. Foes in their midst tried their utmost to persuade the bishops that a re-declaration in modern times was unnecessary, which is like saying that those who said their morning prayers as children have no need to repeat them in later life.
Pius IX wanted a dogmatic Council to reaffirm Papal Infallibility for one very vital reason. He wanted to make clear that past Church judgments, being infallible as they are, are therefore permanent, binding for all ages and thus are never to be reopened or reformed so as to give them new expressions.
The Church's judgments are irreformable and constant because they are the living echoes of the infallible teachers of the Faith down through the centuries. And Pius IX wanted a modern-day dogmatic Council to spell this out.
Unfortunately, many prelates were unable to see why the Church, in spite of Her judgments, couldn't give a little here and there, as the prelates seemed willing to do in their personal judgments. It would make life more pleasant for them if the Church were not so unyielding. That this would jeopardize the Faith, leading to its inevitable demolition, was of no great, concern to bishops favoring the policy of compromise, although they didn't see this as a compromise.
American Example: - Concerning such policy it must be noted that in whatever country the influence of Jewry and its Freemasonry is strong, those bishops are weak on the protective needs of Holy Church in the constancy and permanency of Her judgments.
Take America for example. American prelates, in disobedience to Popes, have kept priests from reading and teaching from their pulpits the papal encyclicals because their contents might offend Jews and Protestant Masons. These encyclicals would have early alerted the Catholic populace to the dangerous enemy in our land and also made known the duty to overcome them; but for the sake of false peace, American bishops held their tongues, the people remained in their ignorance, all the while sopping up the enemy's anti-Christian mentality and ideas through osmosis. Knowingly or unknowingly, the actions and speech of American bishops have all too often mirrored the sophistries of the Synagogue and the Grand Lodges. What the people see and hear their bishops do and speak, they will imitate.
For America, the land ruled by the Jew and Freemason, the Bishop of Baltimore ran the show from the sidelines at V-I. He urged the bishop of Cincinnati to gather signatures to be presented to the Pope begging that infallibility not be re-declared. However, the bishop of Baltimore didn't want to be caught with his signature on the petition so he declined to sign, using his position as a member of the Committee of the Faith as his excuse. There were 27 who did sign it, almost all of them Americans (Life and Work of Pope Leo XIII, by Rev. J. J. McGovern, D. D,, 1903, "Archbishop Purcell on Infallibility").
But by no means were American bishops alone in their opposition. Other Jew-Masonic strongholds gave evidence of influence as indicated by the 140 German, Hungarian, French and Italian bishops who addressed a similar petition to the Holy Father, who naturally refused to adopt the prejudicial plea. The final vote re-declaring papal infallibility with the constancy and irreformability of Church judgments and the re-outlawing of appeals to an ecumenical Council over the head of the Popes was pronounced upon by 975 prelates.
Jew Plans Frustrated: - The outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War that caused the hasty closing of the V-I Council was a fortuitous event, frustrating the plans of the Jews at the very time they were about to have their "postulate" question on the Jews come before a general discussion by the duped Council Fathers who had fallen for the switcheroo game. Despite what V-1 was in the process of declaring concerning infallibility and the non-opening of past judgments, the perfidious Jews were in the heat of pulling off their coup anyway. Thanks to the war the Jews didn't get the floor - at V-1, that is.
DEATH BLOWS BY VATICAN I
To combat the conciliarist evil of reopening past judgments, Vatican Council I, in its First Dogmatic Constitution, issued on July 18, 1870, declares:
"And since, by the divine right of Apostolic primacy, one Roman pontiff is placed over the universal Church, We further teach and declare that he is the supreme judge of the faithful, and that in all causes the decision of which belongs to the Church recourse may be had to his tribunal, but that none may reopen the judgments of the Apostolic See, than whose authority there is no greater, nor can any lawfully review its judgment. Wherefore they err from the path of truth who assert that it is lawful to appeal from the judgments of the Roman pontiff to an ecumenical council, as to an authority higher than that of the Roman pontiff" [Chap. III] (Dogmatic Canons and Decrees, pp. 249-250).
In the words used by Pope Nicholas I, and in the Synod of Quedlinburg (1085), "It is allowed to none to review its judgments, and to sit in judgment upon what it has judged" (Quoted in footnote to the cited V-1 document; ibid., pp. 256-257).
It was, then, wrong for John 23 to call [appeal] to the V-2 Council to reform the past judgments of the Church in order to give them "newer expressions" and differing meanings.
There is absolutely no appeal from an infallible judgment. And so the First Vatican Council also dealt the death blow to V-2. V-I, like Execrabilis, made certain that V-2 would die aborning.
There is nothing ambiguous about either Execrabilis or the reaffirmation of this great Bulla by the First Vatican Council, a little more than 100 years ago.
Contrary to what the enemies of Christ say, Catholics don't need to be canon lawyers to catch the plain sense and meaning of what Execrabilis and Vatican Council I say about councils called to escape the Church's judgments. However, the Marrano enemy is presently using this spurious argument in the hopes the priests and laity will feel defeated and lose confidence in using the Church's weapons, as if these mighty instruments are useless or do not say what they emphatically declare. The Marrano enemy inside the Church desires to use their own lawyers, their false theologians or theosophists, all schooled in misinterpreting, misapplying and subverting the Church's eternally-binding Laws. The Marrano enemy has set himself up as the only one qualified to tell us what the Church has laid down. The Marranos pretend past Church Laws are antiquated and inapplicable to today's conditions. Let us be alert to the age-old tricks of the Marranos, be aware of the switcheroo treachery they are up to.
FOUR IMPORTANT FEATURES
Execrabilis has four important features: 1. the binding nature of the Church's judgments; 2. the wide coverage of persons on whom the sentence falls; 3. the requirements for lifting the sentence; 4. the effect of Church Laws on councils wrongly called and used.
A. The term "judgment" as used in Execrabilis, and as amplified and re-affirmed by Council V-1, sweepingly embraces dogma, doctrine, teaching and worship. Execrabilis covers not only the judgments of the Church then existing at the time of Pope Pius II but also locks in the judgments of succeeding popes against attacks by an illegal council or an unlawfully acting pontiff. Thus every judgment of the Church touching faith and morals is embraced. Condemned are all the suppressions, innovations, changes and false doctrines introduced by the 2nd Vatican Council, including its attempt to change the thinking and attitude of Catholics on faith and morals. This Law is a defense against any who attempt to change the Church's judgments against rabbinic Jewry, Freemasonry, Communism, Naturalism, Humanism, anti-Supernaturalism, et cetera.
B. The next thing to note is the wide coverage of persons upon whom the sentence of Execrabilis falls. Everyone - a Pope included - who violates the law laid down in Execrabilis is deemed guilty. Thus all who plot and call an illegal council ... sit on commissions and draft anti-Catholic schemas ... take part in its proceedings against the Church ... or implement or promote such a judgment-breaking council - all violate the intent and spirit of Execrabilis and are automatically thrust out of the Church with the sentence of anathema which means damnation.
Therefore, John 23 who called the 2nd Vatican Council to question and evade the Church's judgments, and Paul 6 who dedicated himself to furthering the illegal Council and who completed its work, issued all its documents and implemented the Council, were put out of the Church with the indignation of God upon their souls.
Similarly excommunicated with the wrath of God are the priests who worked on the various preparatory commissions and prepared hostile schemas, and also the prelates, consultors, advisors who participated in the V-2 Council's anti-Catholic activities in any way, inasmuch as their efforts constituted adherence to and the extending of favor and assistance to the enemies of Christ, for it is they who appealed for the V-2 Council. Likewise banished from the Church are all diocesan bishops who saddle the Saviour's sheepfold with V-2. Teachers, heads and faculty of seminaries, colleges, universities who promote the work of the V-2 Council incur the sentence of Execrabilis since they spread the false doctrines of the enemies of the Cross in opposition to the judgments of Christ's Church.
So extensive is the coverage of the guilty that even scriveners and witnesses and, in general, all those who knowingly furnish counsel, help, or favor those who appealed for the V-2 Council (Jews and Masons) are punished with the same drastic penalty. The guilty include all who wilfully accept the heretical V-2 Council and its bad fruits: all priests who, in violation of their oath to defend the Church against heresy, embrace the new and strange teachings of V-2, knowing they are opposed to the judgments of the Apostolic Catholic Church, who submit to the unlawful suppressing of the Sacrifice of the Mass and tolerate the anti-Catholic "New Ordo," who turn aside the Trent Catechism to teach V-2/CCD false doctrine, or in any way aid in the entrenching of the execrable and illegal V-2 Council - all are excommunicated from the Apostolic Church with the indignation of God upon their heads.
C. The third notable aspect of Execrabilis is its reserving to the Supreme Pontiff alone the power to lift the sentence of excommunication attaching to the guilty for this particular sin.
This reserving of absolution naturally presupposes a legitimate Pontiff able to lift the dreadful sentence. But, since 1958, no legitimate representative of Christ sits upon the earthly seat of Judgment. Usurpers, men who suppress the Primacy and Sovereignty of Christ's Church, men who refuse the triple Crowned Tiara and all it signifies, lack the power of the keys. Such imposters are unable to either excommunicate or lift the sentence of excommunication. These imposters, in spite of their "elections," have by their heresies thrust themselves out of the Church and therefore cannot lift the excommunication, because one who is put outside the Church cannot lawfully exercise any of the Papal Power (see Fr. Saenz, "The Vacant See," Veritas, Dec. 1975). Those who are outside the Church are not inside the Church.
Since the Chair of Peter is vacant1 at this time, those who have fallen under the sentence of Execrabilis are in BIG trouble because, as the Council of Trent tells us, "Priests have no power of absolution in reserved cases except at the point of death." Trent also tells us: " ... that the absolution which a priest pronounces upon one over whom he has not either an ordinary or a delegated jurisdiction ought to be of no weight whatever" (Doctrine on the Sacrament of Penance, Chap. VII, "On the Reservation of Cases," Sess. XIV. Can be found in Dogmatic Canons and Decrees; New York: The Devin-Adair Co., 1912, pp. 102-103).
For a priest to absolve a reserved sin at point of death, it is essential there be an acknowledgement of guilt. It is essential that the sinner abjure V-2; he must repent participating in the illegal V-2 Council or the promoting, supporting or implementing of it, as well as acts favoring those who caused the illegal V-2 Council to be called. Without repentance there can be no absolving the reserved sin which remains unconfessed. In such sinful, unrepentant and unabsolved state the sinner goes to meet his Maker.
The world has witnessed V-2 popes go to their death unrepentant and unabsolved of their V-2 crimes against God and His Church, as defined in Execrabilis and by the First Vatican Council. It is reported that on his death bed John 23 "in firm tones discussed the Council and expressed his wishes as to its future in very definite terms" (Hatch, A Man Named John; Image Books, a division of Doubleday & Co., Inc., 1963, page 226).
In John's deathroom stood many prelates of the Church, two of them his confessors. None of them bothered to help John 23 reconcile himself with and make his peace with the Creator because they themselves would not admit the wrongness of the judgment-breaking illegal V-2 Council, would not admit that it is a mortal sin to alter, supplant and suppress the infallible judgments of the Church, or sinful to call a council to achieve these condemned goals, or that the Church does indeed inflict penalties, stretching into eternity, upon those who break Her Laws. What is bound on earth is bound also in Heaven under the Power of the Keys.
Paul 6, the immediate successor of John 23, also stood by the illegal V-2 Council even in the time of death. Anticipating his own death as early as 1963 at age 66, in the year of his election, Paul 6 wrote his last will and testament and added to it in 1972 and again in 1973. Seeming to be very much aware that he was not a true Representative of Christ, he requested that he neither have a funeral like true Pontiffs nor have a similar burial.
In his typical caustic sniping at genuine Catholic practices and holy tradition he stated: "As regards my funeral: let it be simple and animated by religious piety. I do not wish to have the catafalque, as is the custom for the funeral of Popes; instead let things be carried out in a humble and becoming manner." As to his tomb - he wanted none. "No monument for me." V-2 was to be his monument, the epitome of impiety.
In his last will and testament, Paul 6 wrote of his main wish - the implementation of the heretical V-2 Council. " ... Let its prescriptions be put into effect." As to ecumenism he stated: "the approach to the separated Brethren must go on ..." He added with his usual Modernist deceit, "but without deflecting from true Catholic doctrine." The false ideas held by Paul 6 regarding "true Catholic doctrine" were far from the divine truths given to the Catholic Church in the Two Founts of Supernatural Revelation.
In his final testament Paul 6 turned aside from the Church's warnings against the world, the flesh and the devil. All true Pontiffs have pictured the world as the city of Satan very much opposed to the City of God. They counsel the faithful to serve God, not the world. But Paul 6 said "one must study the world, love it and serve it" (taken from "The Testament of Paul VI," L'OR [L'Osservatore Romano], August 24, 1978, pages 1, 2).
Sensing his days were numbered - as indicated by his frequent reference to dying - Paul 6 was in a hurry to get on with entrenching the V-2 Council more deeply. The last months of the life of Paul 6 saw an intensified program by him in implementing V-2 which included his malicious dedication to making the Vatican the special and cordial meeting place and haven for Jews, Masons, Communists, all avowed enemies of the One True Faith and One True Church.
Paul 6 called for closer and closer ties between Catholics and Jewry. Newspaper photographs and headlines repeatedly recorded his flaunting Papal decrees and Church Laws against fraternizing and actively supporting the enemies of the Cross and Christian Order. In private audiences he told Jews and Moslems, rejecters of Christ, that they worship the same God as Catholics. When he wasn't entertaining the enemy at the Vatican he sent representatives to address the Godless UNO to stress "peace," meaning the Church would not oppose Her enemy, continually reassuring this pledge which he had made publicly before the UNO in October 1965.
This "man of sin," Paul 6, invaded the heart and soul of the Catholic family in urging a more liberal interpretation of the marriage laws, so as to destruct more and more Catholic marriages.
His General Audiences were constant calls to "follow the [V-2] Council."
This is but a brief list of the many monstrous crimes of Paul 6 against Christ's Church and the Faith during his last days. Right up to the day of his death Paul 6 had busied himself laboring for the further advancement of the illegal V-2 Council.
Without regret or remorse Paul 6 departed this life leaving worldwide spiritual chaos in his wake: millions of souls languishing for the divine Mass and Sacraments that Paul 6 suppressed and supplanted with his own form of V-2 worship and liturgy to man and the lord of this world. So great is the devastation by V-2 that the See of Peter and the episcopal Sees everywhere have been emptied. The Brides of Christ are bewildered, confused, scattered and gone, cut down like grain before the scythe. The priests of Christ turn away from Him, unwilling to understand what has happened at the hands of the "man of perdition."
Such was this ephod-wearing man, Paul 6, bearer of "the Broken Cross," whose career and last testament opposed the Eternal Testament of Christ. Arrogant and hardened to the very end, unheedful of the judgment of God's Wrath, imposed by Execrabilis and other eternally-binding judgments of His Church, Paul 6 came face to face with the Eternal Judge. With millions of souls and the Angels and Saints witnessing against him, Paul 6 dared to meet God, He Who says "Vengeance is Mine, and I will repay " (Rom. 12: 19). What a dreadful state to be in, standing before the Judgment Throne of Heaven.
Next came J-P 1, occupier of the papal chair for only 33 days, who willfully preferred to trod the deflecting footsteps of his two immediate predecessors John 23 and Paul 6 - even to the taking of their names.
In pledging his fullest support to the illegal V-2 Council, J-P 1 refused the Tiara and designated himself "the first Minister" of the conciliar sect counter-church founded by John 23 and Paul 6, the two main puppets of the synagogue who had been unlawfully given the Chair of Peter to carry out the plot against Christ's Church. J-P 1 did not desire to be a true Pontiff; not wanting to be known or accepted as the Supreme Pontiff of Christ's Church, as indeed he was not, and was well aware of this accusing fact.
Two of his most scandalous testaments were his collection of letters and his statements regarding his lack of belief.
In an ill-conceived "letter" to Christ, J-P 1 dared to presume to counsel Christ, the Author of Charity, the Word of God, as to what to say and what to promise. On his disbelief, he publicly stated he no longer accepted the Divine Religion, entrusted to the Catholic Church to safeguard and to teach, as the "only true religion" with rights that others have not and that he no longer believed that only truth has rights. "In the end," he said, "I convinced myself that we had been wrong" (see Veritas, Aug.-Sept. 1978, pages 14, 19).
The record is clear. None of these three V-2 "popes," unholy holders of the Papal Chair, regretted the anti-Christian acts against the Church and Faith brought about by V-2. And so the binding judgment of Execrabilis fell full force upon all three. Such was their status when the Angel of Death whisked their souls away to the Courts of Heaven.
V-2 cardinals, bishops, priests, religious and laity are also dying unrepentant and unabsolved of their guilt in the infamous V-2 Council. Unpardoned because of their hardened refusal to acknowledge V-2 is wrong; unshrived because of their refusal to admit the evil consequences V-2's satanic actions have brought upon the earth.
Because of V-2 the whole world is in BIG trouble. To be implicated in any way with a council like V-2 is something not to be dismissed lightly.
And what about the latest pretend "pope," Tiaraless John Paul 2, who revels in calling Paul 6 his "father" and "mentor"? Karol Wojtyla, coming to Rome from behind the iron-curtain country of Poland, has told us over and over that he is committed to carrying out all the wishes of Paul 6 regarding the V-2 Council. In other words Charlie will carry out the will and testament of the anti-Christian Paul 6 rather than execute the Will and Testament of Jesus Christ, Whose Blood has sealed forever the Covenant of the Sanctuary in the Sacrifice of the Cross which every priest has been commanded to offer "in Memory of ME." So the divine Covenant of the Sanctuary, forsaken by Paul 6, will continue to be forsaken, and replaced and supplanted by the satanic covenant of Paul 6 and his New Order under the "ministry" of J-P 2. "In memory of Paul 6" - in place of "In Memory of ME" - is to be the guiding light of J-P 2.
Is there any sign of regret in the speech and actions of J-P 2? Certainly not. Having begun his V-2 "ministry" sans Crown and Coronation, Charlie has picked up the "Broken Cross" bequeathed to him by Paul 6, carrying this Communist "peace symbol" as a brazen sign, a code the enemies of the Cross understand only too well, but which deceives the gullible who mistakenly think JP-2 is paying Christ respect.
Because of his participation in the anti-Christian actions during the V-2 Council, and also because of his publicly professed total commitment to the implementation of the illegal V-2 Council, the terrible sentence of Execrabilis lays on the head of J-P 2.
D. The fourth essential feature of Execrabilis is its DEMOLISHING EFFECT on V-2 and any council called to escape the Church's judgments.
Execrabilis pronounces, declares and decrees all such councils - no matter in what age they are called - to be beforehand CONDEMNED, REPROVED, QUASHED and ANNULLED.
In effect, under its sweeping decree of nullity, V-2 and all its documents and its actions are emptied of all standing, are stripped of all legitimacy, and rendered wholly null and void! V-2 is as if it never had been called, so far as binding the Church or commanding obedience of any person.
Consequently, the V-2 Council, called at the request of the enemies of Christ, is wiped away and no Catholic is bound by it in any way. Wilful adherence or obedience to the condemned and quashed V-2 Council subjects a person to ipso facto excommunication and the wrath of God. In this way the Apostolic Church safeguards and maintains respect for Her valid Councils.
VATICAN COUNCIL II
Some 90 years elapsed from the time of the First Vatican Council (1869-70) to the time of the 2nd Vatican Council (1963-65). To Jewry time means nothing when it comes to getting its way.
It explains why World Jewry can patiently wait from one century to another, endure from one Council to another, biding the opportunity to gain its goal. After all, Organized Jewry has waited 2,000 years to get what it wanted from the V-2 Council. This huge success of Jewry in gaining control over the Church was, to speak practically, the simple matter of getting one council to do what Jewry was unable to achieve at an earlier Council.
So it was, that what these enemies of Christ and His Church had failed to obtain from Vatican I, the passing of time coupled with their cunning and treachery would gain for Jewry at the 2nd Vatican Council whose switcheroo game was to offer ways for departing from and evading the Church's judgments.
The V-2 Council was early characterized the "Jewish Council" because of the many outrageous demands made to and granted by this illegal Council manipulated by International Jewry. Its destructive demands have produced a thorough revamping and restructuring of the Catholic Faith and Church, as is evident in parishes worldwide, the direct result of reopening the totality of the Church's irreformable judgments. As a consequence, everything - doctrine, teaching, worship, thinking and attitude - is corrupted by the enemies of Christ via the 2nd Vatican Council.
Marrano Gimmick: - The Marranos used "updating the Church" as their deceptive gimmick to influence the council bishops to depart from the Church's judgments. This stick device is still used for winning and holding Catholics to V-2. This slogan is a crafty appeal to the vanity of Catholics young and old who wish not to be tagged as "out-of-step" or "not-with-the times" - making them prime subjects for mind and attitude changing. This trick of Jewry is vastly successful, as shown by the bulk of Catholics who, knowing it is not the faith of the ages that V-2 brings them, still adhere to V-2 nevertheless.
Some have the brass and ignorance to rationalize the radical changes of the counter-church: "This is the way I always thought the Church should be. The old way was too limiting, too legalistic. Now all that is changed, done away with. They were only man-made laws, open to change or to be discontinued. Once they served a purpose. Now we know better and have done away with them." This statement was made in 1970 by a convert, daughter of a 33rd degree Mason displeased by her conversion, and whose husband has recently been "ordained" a lay deacon of V-2.
The trouble here is the failing to distinguish between administrative or disciplinary rules and the Laws and Judgments of the Church. True, the popes are human beings but because they act as the Vicars of Christ, the Laws and Judgments of the Church become the Laws and Judgments of God by their infallible nature and the binding Power of the Keys entrusted to His Church, and therefore not subject to change or discontinuance As earlier shown, no one may lawfully judge or change the Church's constant and infallible Decrees and Judgments.
How it is possible to "update the Church" by returning to rejected practices out of the past - for instance, reviving the lay diaconate that proved unnecessary and very dangerous to the celibate priesthood and therefore justly outlawed - and by wholesale scuttling of necessary infallible and permanent judgments, has remained unexplained. The confounding of distinctions is the vehicle used for "updating" by which Catholics are lead to return to rejected ancient practices while discarding the wholesome and permanent ones, and are induced to accept the substitution of everything false in place of God's truths. In "updating" disorder rules as a king.
There's the "updating" marriage encounter fiasco and the teenage "retreats" where individuals are disgraced, spiritually slapped, put out of orientation and harmony and shoved into disorder. Yet, these victims, while in the throes of their "physical touching" high, like it. So, then, "updating" incorporates S. T. (Sensitivity Training), Jewish Sama Kritica.
In August 1976 at the Congress in Philadelphia, 17,000 hand-holding married couples of the growing, lustful Marriage Encounter Movement attended a "nervous ordo" described by a reporter as a "love-in." At their week-long workshops, Rev. Chuck Gallagher, S. J., its prime mover, told the members to stress "non-verbal communication." Matrimonial spirituality is described as the mates looking deep into each other's eyes. They were told that "touching is crucial ... do not hold hands sexlessly"! Eight bishops including V-2 Cardinal Wright came to the convention to urge them on in their public display of disrespect for chastity and dignity of person. And this is Marrano "updating" of Christ's Church.
As time goes by, it becomes more evident that the "restructuring" goal of V-2 is to communize the Church and Her members. Never were its adherents more blunt concerning their intentions than they were at the Congress where the counter. church presented the plans of its counter-culture.
Throngs representing an incredibly diverse collection of groups came to the 1976 Philadelphia Congress. The majority came to share their personal experiences since V-2 and to seek reassurance that the V-2 "updating" and "renewal" are right. Naturally, they couldn't find this reassurance in Pennsylvania or elsewhere, but there was an attention-diverter in the form of fun and games to be shared. Touching!
The minority were radicals, there to challenge the Christian Order and to sell to the members of the V-2 counter-church the counter-culture of V-2 in opposition to Christian culture. These radicals demand personal and structural change in Catholics and institutions; they want a "stepping back" from our consumer lifestyle and a "stepping forward" toward political action. What can all this mean but a revolutionary call to Jew-inspired Communism and anarchy.
Look at the outrageous Cursillio movement now blossomed into the more frantic charismatic craze under the impetus of "updating." In July 1976, at Stubenville, Ohio, 1,000 priests, aged 40-60, attended a charismatic meeting where they joined in singing, prayer-shouting, hand-waving, hugging and "healing." They were urged to "declericize" the ministry and make the laity the ministers, get ready for the collapse of the social order, the Church Institution [parishes and schools were mentioned]. And this, too, spells out the Marrano "updating" of the Church.
Those misdirected clergy kept shouting and laughing it up while being told not to presume that God's will for "renewal" was only for Catholics alone but to go over and help the Protestants to do likewise for they like Catholic pastors"! Priests were told that God is "suspending rules of growth and holiness in the rapid spread of charismatic renewal"... and that Paul 6 and Arch- bishop Bernardin, at the time president of the U. S. Bishops, went "beyond human wisdom" to endorse charismatic renewal. Indeed they did; and also outside of Divine Wisdom. Their endorsement of "charismatic renewal" had the prompting of Satan; for the "charismatic movement" is an attempt to repossess and reclaim the unique and extraordinary powers specially placed by the Holy Ghost in the Apostles. The "movement" is neither Apostolic Catholic nor new; non-Catholics have for centuries attempted to speak in tongues and to heal as the Apostles had the extraordinary power to do in their time. The founding and unholy activities of this devilish charismatic movement, spreading worldwide under V-2, with its brazen claim to capture and possess the specially-privileged powers of the Apostles constitutes a sin against the Holy Ghost.
And all this, dear Catholic friends, is V-2's updating of the Church. "Updating" and "renewal" is the method for bringing anti-Catholic and atheistic influences into Christ's Church.
PRICE OF UPDATING
For listening to the bigotry and lies of the rabbinic gnostic Jews via the detestable and execrable V-2 Council, the V-2ers are in a state of rebellion against God. They have contracted the same spiritual malady of the Jews: blindness, hardness of heart, and the Wrath of God.
Is this not reason enough for all V-2ers to pause and consider whether their continued adherence to the illegal and execrable V-2 Council is worth the loss of their soul? Let the hierarchy, priests, religious, sisters and laity, who unwisely think that in partaking of V-2's sins they are "updating" and "renewing" the Church in the modern mentality, take clear note of the spiritual jeopardy into which they have been plunged by the execrable V-2 Council. Let them obey the heavenly injunction to come out from the V-2 counter-church, the harlot, lest they too be partakers of her sins and receive her plagues (Apoc. 18: 4ff).
A WAY OUT - To be at peace with God, one must renounce V-2 completely, "come out from her" all the way, and never go back. If you cannot find a non-V-2 priest to confess your past guilt, then do as the Church instructs those who have no available priest: Make a Perfect Act of Contrition. "O my God! l am heartily sorry for having offended Thee, and I detest all my sins, because I dread the loss of Heaven and the pains of hell, but most of all because they offend Thee, my God, Who art all-good and deserving of all my love. I firmly resolve, with the help of Thy grace, to confess my sins, to do penance, and to amend my life. Amen."
Before God, renounce V-2 and all its works and pomps. Firmly resolve never again to participate in any of its activities. Then we must place ourselves into the Merciful Hands of God and await the day when we can receive the absolution of a genuinely faithful Apostolic Catholic priest. Many of us will have to die without a priest, as did Paul McCabe back in 1971 (see Veritas, August 1971), and as others have done. We must trust in God ... keep His Commandments ... hold fast to the Faith ... respect the Laws and Judgments of the Apostolic Church. Be not duped or confounded by the V-2 counter-church.
CANON 58, 4th TOLEDO COUNCIL
Apart from Execrabilis and Vatican Council I, how can we be sure that a council favoring Jewry at the expense of the Church and Faith has the DISAPPROVAL and CONDEMNATION of the Church, We are guided to certitude by Canon 58 of the Fourth Toledo Council held in Spain at the height of the Jewish influence in that nation (see Veritas, July-October 1975, pp. 33-34). This great Canon declares:
"There is concern over those members who - in showing support and favor to the Jews against the faith of Christ through accepting presents from Jews or aiding their perfidy and according them protection, knowing such persons belong to the body of Antichrist since they work against the Faith.
Accordingly, every bishop, priest, religious or layman who in the future give support to Jews against the Christian Faith, be it through briberies or favors, shall be regarded as profane and blaspheming God, and shall be excluded from the Communion of the Catholic Church and shall be regarded as not belonging to the Kingdom of God; for it is no more than right, that those who reveal themselves as protectors of the enemies of the Lord, be separated from the [Mystical] Body of Christ."
This Canon, striking a death blow to V-2, is but one of a series of Laws against the Jews and for the protection of the Church enacted by the many Toledo Councils. This sweeping Canon is important and useful against the V-2 Council for two reasons.
First, the Canons of the Toledo Council were declared to be ETERNALLY BINDING and constant. Meaning that this Canon against Jewry can never be changed or repealed or declared inoperative or as having no application to our times. Secondly, present at the Toledo Councils was a Legate of the Supreme Pontiff to offer advice and give acquiescence to the laws adopted. Thus the Canons of the Toledo Council against Jewry and against those in the Church giving aid, comfort and protection to Jewry in its warring against the Church and Faith are the eternally-binding Judgments of the Holy See. These Judgments are especially applicable to today's subversive campaign by Jewry with its preposterous assertion that Holy Scripture and the Catholic Faith are "anti-semitic" and "offensive to Jews" and so must be changed to conform to the anti-Christian mentality of the synagogue.
Accordingly, the moment John 23 called the V-2 Council as a favor to Jewry and in support of its war against Christ and His Church, at that very instant was John 23 automatically separated from the Kingdom of God, on earth and in Heaven, as adjudged by Canon 58 of the 4th Toledo Council. So, too, did Paul 6 separate himself from the Kingdom of God and the Catholic Church in his continuing and implementing the illegal and execrable V-2 Council called to give support to Jewry against the Christian Faith. You could not pray for anything to be more clear, more certain. Canon 58 of the 4th Toledo Council is the clincher, dissolving all doubts.
ACTS FAVORING JEWRY
What constitutes actions favoring and supporting Jewry against the Christian Faith? We will list a few obvious ones.
Participating in Seder meals is an act favoring Jewry against the Christian Faith ... taking part in synagogue "interfaith services" favors and supports Jewry ... permitting Jews to purge Catholic books or to rewrite books on Catholic doctrine is to favor and support those belonging to the body of Antichrist ... allowing Jews to lecture or teach in Catholic schools, seminaries, colleges, universities is to lend support and favor to Jewry against the Catholic Church and Faith ... inviting and permitting Jews to speak from Catholic pulpits is to favor and support Jewry's war against Christ ... to give ear to the erroneous teachings of the talmudic gnostic Jews in their pretense that their interpretation of Holy Scripture is better than the Catholic teaching is to help strengthen Jewry's false religion and to favor and support Jewry against the Catholic Faith and Christ's Church ... to remove sacred images and to replace these with Jewish inspired iconoclastic art in churches is to cater to Jewry and insult Christ ... to give support to the false charge of "anti-semitism" is to favor and support Jewry's animosity toward Christ ... to promote Catholic/Jewish relations, dialogue, "closer ties" is to promote and favor Jewry ... to protect and aid an unbelieving, talmudic-gnostic Masonic Jew sitting in the Chair of Peter (Paul 6) is to favor and support Jewry's war against Christ Jesus, God the Son, Who became Man for our sake ... to follow and support holders of the Holy Chair who pledge to continue and to implement the illegal V-2 Council is to aid and support Jewry's war against the divine Church and Faith.
The list could go on and on. It is impossible for anyone to participate in the works of the Jewish V-2 Council and not aid Jewry's war against Christ and His Church. Punishment for supporting and favoring the enemies of the Faith is separation from the Kingdom of God both on earth and in Heaven, as Canon 58 adjudges.
V-2 COUNTER-ATTACK
Caught under the heavy fire from the Church's mighty arsenal of weapons, Her many Canons and Judgments, the V-2ers were for a time displaying a frenzied haste to apply counter-force, in the form of criticisms and sarcasms from Paul 6 and others, directed against those who oppose the illegal V-2 and the bogus popes.
Both John 23 and Paul 6 leaned heavily on "obedience" to themselves and their V-2 Council while clearly engaging in defiant disobedience to Almighty God by acting contrary to the Two Founts of Supernatural Revelation and against the infallible judgments of the divine Church Christ founded. Paul 6 went so far as to label (in 1973) as "broken stems" those who pointed out his heresies, as if those who are obedient to God are the excommunicated. All cleverly deceitful and completely erroneous but the dirty tactic of the bogus popes and their lackeys nevertheless. The actual "broken stems" are the bogus popes and their followers who have cut themselves off from orthodoxy and Apostolic tradition. Those faithful Catholics who oppose the bogus popes and their evil V-2 Council can be found on the ramparts fighting the religious blackguards and traitors.
The late Father Saenz was one of these rampart fighters. In his work The Vacant See he pointed out that holders of the Holy Chair, who behave like John 23 and Paul 6, are deposed by God Himself.
Some of you may recall back in 1975 when the late Hugh McGovern was publishing the Voice he called attention to the Bulla of Pope Paul IV, issued in February of 1559, which made evident that Paul 6 could not be a legitimate Pontiff.
A brochure entitled "Had Paul IV Foreseen Paul VI?", and containing the text of the Bulla, began making the rounds in the States, Canada, England, Australia and parts of Europe. It caused great concern within V-2 circles. They were hard pressed in making a reply against it. Not that they didn't try.
BULLA OF PAUL IV
There was a certain Abbe des Graviers, writing in Courier de Rome (No. 156, pp 9-12), who took issue with Catholics applying the Bulla of Paul IV to Paul 6. His first whine was that ordinary Catholics have no knowledge of Canon Law, and he whimpered that it cannot be concluded that Cardinal Montini (Paul 6) was invalidly elected to the Roman See, and he was aghast to discover that sensible Catholics are saying the Apostolic See has been vacant since 1958 at the death of Pope Pius XII.
Abbe des Graviers thought that since there is a question whether the Bulla was ever applied, it is doubtful that it can be applied now. This is a silly argument. Sensing this, he came up with what he feels is a stronger objection, saying: "In any case, this is of little import for since 1918 we have had the Code of Canon Law and Pope Benedict XV's constitution Providentissma Mater Ecclesia. Graviers says this has become the Law of the Church and it is it that defines what it is to be a heretic, and, as he says, "it is indispensable to know what is the definition of a heretic."
Then Abbe Graviers said: "Neither Fr. Giovanni Battista Montini, nor Mgr. Montini, nor Cardinal Montini was ever canonically reprimanded," despite his many heretical statements contrary to the Catholic Faith. Therefore, said Abbe Graviers, the man could not be a formal heretic and pointed to the "Credo of Paul 6." It may surprise the Abbe to learn this credo is full of heresy (see Veritas, Dec. 1972).
Abbe said it would be impossible for Paul 6 to teach heresy Ex Cathedra, overlooking that Paul 6 had never issued anything Ex Cathedra. The Abbe was obviously using these evasive and puny arguments to get around Pope Paul IV's Bulla that automatically judges a person to be a heretic without a formal judgment, if the guilty primate had fallen from the Faith before elevation to a Church office.
Abbe Graviers said "there's little left of this Bulla, retained only in Canon 2.264, 2.228, 2.232, 2,242, 2.265." He imbibed heresy himself: "Thus the conclusion is quite simple: it is not possible to have recourse to the Constitution of Paul IV as a weapon against Paul 6 (Montini). To do so would be neither honest nor canonically sound." He ignores that the Apostolic Church has already judged that it is fair, honest, proper, yea, a duty to apply to the fullest all past Church Judgments along with their severest penalties against those who dare to speak lies against Christ's Spotless Bride and attempt to kill Her.
There is a response to Abbe Graviers arguments.
Providently, Church judgments, such as the Bulla of Pope Paul IV, become operative without need of official action. The Bulla of Paul IV is conditional not on reprimand but on public heresy. The Bulla, itself, constitutes the essential canonical reprimand. Accordingly, one who, before his election to the Papal Chair, was a hardened, public heretic, as in the case of Paul 6, cannot be the legitimate successor of Peter. If he should sit in the Holy Chair, he does so as an usurper.
CODEX
As for the Codex, we are well aware that the enemies of the Church have been attempting to boil down all Church Laws and Judgments to a collection of Canons that become weaker and more ambiguous with each tampering. Paul 6 had set up a Commission to revamp the Canons of the Apostolic Church. This destructive work has continued under the direction of the succeeding bogus popes. The watering-down process, however, began back in the days of Pope Pius X, who asked for a Codex, placing Cardinal Gasparri in charge, who unfortunately accepted help from Marranos like Cardinal Rampollo. To the Marranos, who are forever looking for some escape from the true teaching of the Church existing from Apostolic times in relation to the Jews, the calling for a Codex was an exhilarating event, a break-through, a great opportunity to wipe out any Church Law that restricts and hampers the work of the "synagogue of Satan."
As long as the Church's Laws were readily available, out-in-the-open and used, they posed a serious threat to the enemies of the Cross, who faced deposing, excommunication and the other penalties laid down in the Holy Church Canons. Hence, it was the chief concern of the enemy-within to remove this troublesome hindrance. But how was it possible to abolish with one blow the centuries old Church Laws and Judgments, Papal Bullas and the teachings of Christ, His Apostles and the early Church Fathers? How were these to be removed or rendered unavailable so that the secret Jewish clergy could serve their Jewish masters without fear of being deposed and excommunicated, and how were they to be able to also falsify the doctrine of the Church in relation to the Jews, so as to promote their Jewish goal of the defeat of Christianity and the gaining of a victory over its old foe?
In the course of centuries the Jews and their Fifth Column in the clergy have repeatedly made attempts to suppress the Church's protective laws against Jewry and to achieve that the Papal Bullas and Her safeguarding legislation regarding Jewry should not fall under the category of unchangeable, ever-binding, infallible status. They have for this purpose, according to the given possibilities, taken the most diverse paths. The Codex was more than they could have hoped for. During the turbulent period of the first world war (1914-18), when so much attention was focused on the struggle, the work of the Codex, lacking strict supervision, offered wide opportunity to the enemy-within. As a result, the voluminous body of Laws and Judgments were suppressed or excluded which represented the most effective defense of Holy Church against the secret Jewish infiltration and its destructive activities in the bosom of this divine institution.
Obviously this sneaky action by the Marranos proves that the Church's legislation regarding the Jews had held them in check and was one of the chief hindrances to bringing Catholicism as well as the society born of Christian Order under Jewish rule. It was Cardinal Gasparri who held the line by inserting into the Codex the rule that in actuality none of the Church's past legislation had been altered and remains in effect.
But in actual practice the Church's protective laws against the synagogue of Satan as well as its many laws against heresy had been carefully left out of the Codex. This painful and exact omission had to be undertaken by a person very interested in the affair; a person who stood in the service of an organization which wanted the Church's Laws on the Jews and on heresy studiously edited and purged. (Plot Against the Church, pp. 430- 433.) Today under V-2 this Jewish editing and purging has been extended to Catholic books.
In the book Plot Against the Church, whose writers are said to have had the blessing of the late Cardinal Ottaviani, it is mentioned tb at the laws regarding Jewry are a part of the "doctrine of the Church and source of the truth as revealed by God" (p. 434), that comes to us through the two founts of Supernatural Revelation. Plot adds: the enemy-within garb their attack against the Apostolic Tradition with flattering, seemingly righteous arguments, which do not allow the poison of their maneuvers to be discerned. "Among other things, they say, the Church must adapt itself to the new times and fight with progress for Christian unity." However, true Christian unity is not their ambition: they seek to "destroy the best defense of Holy Church which has preserved Her through the centuries from the cunning of its most infamous and stiff-necked foe" (ibid).
Exclusion Trick Won't Work - Whether a Codex Commission adopts a policy of disuse or exclusion regarding constant Laws and Judgments, either or both would be tantamount to the sinful reopening of the judgments of former Pontiffs and Dogmatic Councils. A Codex resorting to disuse, exclusion (wholly or partially) or concealment to evade laws and judgments against the Jews, heresy or the Bulla of Pope Paul IV, for instance, would be an incomplete Codex but it could by no means serve as the basis for rendering inoperative the constant, permanent, automatically operating laws and judgments omitted or concealed by the enemy-within or duped members of the Codex Commission. Those Laws and Judgments remain constant and in force, even when ignored or allowed to slip into disuse. Disuse or ignoring cannot wipe them away, anymore than neglect of the Ten Commandments could make God's Laws inoperative or inapplicable.
So a Codex which conceals or excludes the full context of ever-binding laws and judgments, or allows them to fall into disuse, cannot destroy the legal force and effect of those laws and judgments. This is AXIOMATIC to the exercising of the BINDING-POWER placed by Christ in His Apostolic Church. The device of disuse or exclusion cannot unbind what has been bound on earth and in Heaven. Therefore, it is impossible for any Codex to render inoperative the infallible, in perpetuity, eternally-binding Laws and Judgments of the Church. To fashion arguments opposing this axiom is futile. God will not be out-maneuvered.
For anyone to say that Canon 58, the Bulla of Paul IV, Execrabilis, Vatican I and all the other judgments of the Church bearing on the illegality of V-2, and on the impossibility of a public heretic legitimately holding Peter's Chair, cannot be used against V-2 or the fraudulent holders of the Holy Office, is neither acceptable nor truthful. Nor is it a valid argument to say that Church Militant cannot use all the timeless weapons of the Church against Her enemies in any age, or to say these weapons do not apply to the present hellish situation: to say so is to lean on satanic falsehood in face of divine truths.
Let there be no mistake: Those of Church Militant ARE using the Church's arsenal of Laws, Judgments, Bullas, and Divine Doctrines NOW against V-2, the bogus popes, those who crafted V-2 and its documents, and each and all evils that have come from these. It is up to Church Militant to let the world know that such weapons exist. We need to make widely known the existence and death-blow effect of Execrabilis and the affirming declaration of Vatican I Council, as well as Canon 58 (4th Toledo Council), the Bulla of Pope Paul IV, and the authorities cited by Fr. Saenz. Broadcast them, pass this booklet around. The overthrow of the enemy and his evil council is up to God, of course; but also up to His Church Militant to take action so that the Judgments of the Church can be realized, using the weapons providently provided.
OUR STAND
To criticize and to put down those who rightly assert the V-2 Council is illegal and must not be obeyed is dishonest. Those who foolishly and recklessly follow V-2 while refusing to listen to those who tell them it is an evil, anti-Catholic council indulge in hypocrisy. To pretend one is Catholic while at the same time obeying a council brought into being by those who hated Catholicism is worse than playing the fool, because of what is under attack by V-2: the divine religion.
Although concealing it from Catholics, the enemy-within knows very well the Apostolic Tradition, the Scriptural and the Canonical basis upon which the assertions of Church Militant are firmly founded. In turn these are the central points of the enemy's attack.
We Apostolic Catholics stand upon the Two Founts of Supernatural Revelation, the two founts fought against by the 5th Column within so bitterly during the V-2 Council years (see Veritas series on Divine Revelation begun in May 1978 and continuing during 1979-80).
We Catholics stand upon the Rock of Peter and the Binding Power of the Keys. We stand upon the INFALLIBLE and IRREFORMABLE Laws and judgments of Christ and His Church.
We stand upon the Apostolic vigilance against the enemy of the Cross. We stand with the Apostles who had much trouble from the hardheaded, spiritually-blinded Jews, some of whom kept sneaking into the Church by way of pretend-conversions with the ulterior motive of tearing down the Church at the beginning and also attempting to buy the healing powers from the Apostles. The divine Catholic Religion has always been "offensive" or "anti-semitic" to the Jews, not because it is but because they pretend it is with their rejection of Christ, so as to seek to be "liberated" from the obligation of conversion and acceptance of the society built upon Christian Order.
We stand upon the Church's doctrine against the perfidious Jews; doctrine that goes back to Christ Himself Who made this Divine Judgment against the hardened, unbelieving Jews: "You are of your father the devil and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and he stood not in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own for he is a liar, and the father thereof.
"But if I say the truth, you believe Me not." (John 8: 44-45).
We Catholics who bring just charges against the V-2 Council and the meddling "synagogue of Satan" (Apoc. 2: 9) and who make the accurate assertion of illegality against the robber V-2 Council and who oppose the damnable interference by World Jewry into the affairs of the divine Church, do not do so on our own or of our own. No.
It is the Apostolic Church Herself, through the binding Power of the Keys, who prejudges the V-2 Council to be execrable, illegal, non-binding, and who prejudged that those who brought it about or pledge their loyalty to it have the Wrath of God upon themselves. The Church passes Her sentence with "bell, book and candle."
A bell tolls ... a book is closed ... a candle is extinguished. The bell tolls for the spiritual death of a soul ... the closing of the book signifies the striking of a name from the Book of Life ... the extinguishing of the candle signifies the spiritual darkness into which a doomed soul is thrust. Bell, book, candle ....
GOD'S STAND
God is against the V-2 Council. It is God Himself, through His Church, Who is against the judgment-breaking, execrable V-2 Council and its vile counter-religion with its biblical harlot church. Common sense tells you God is on the side of His One and only Church, the divine Church He Himself founded, the One Holy Catholic Apostolic Church standing in vigorous opposition to the V-2 harlot masquerading as His Church and deceitfully speaking in Her Name. This V-2 harlot with whom the bishops of the earth commit fornication, defiling themselves with false ecumenism and diabolically collaborating with the enemy of the Cross. This V-2 harlot who has made the inhabitants of the earth drunk with the wine of her whoredom (Apoc. 17: 2).
Christ Himself deals the death blow to sinful, illegal V-2. His Apostolic Church condemns and quashes the V-2 Council because it makes Catholics the enemies of Christ and His Church ... makes those who promote or support the evil works of the illegal council all traitors to their Christian heritage. We would have no religion, no Catholic Church, no Christian Civilization were all Catholics to ignore the Laws and Judgments of the Church and bow to unlawfully acting bogus popes and their illegal and detestable V-2 council.
No sincere Catholic would want to be associated with the traitorous acts of either V-2 or the bogus popes. It is ridiculous to obey that which the Church says IS NOT, to honor that which Christ's Church has given the DEATH BLOW.
(Note: The text of Execrabilis can be found in Anne Freemantle's The Papal Encyclicals; New York: The New American Library, 1956, pp. 74-76. Library of Congress Cat. No. 56-11328.)
APPENDIX
BULLA OF PAUL IV
(from "Cum Ex Apostolatus Officio")
"We declare that if ever a Bishop, Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate, a Cardinal or a Legatee, OR EVEN A SOVEREIGN POPE, had, before their elevation to the Cardinalcy or Pontificate, deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy, the promotion or elevation - even if it had taken place with the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals - is INVALID and NULL, without value and one cannot say that it is valid because the person concerned accepts the Office, receives the Consecration and then enters into possession of the government and administration [of the Office], or by the homage rendered to him by all; one cannot accept him as legitimate, and none of his acts of power or administration may be deemed valid whether Bishops, Cardinals OR SOVEREIGN POPES. All their words, deeds and actions, their administration and all that proceeds from them - all these are without value and have no authority or command over anyone. These men, so promoted and elevated, will be by the same fact deprived of all dignity, place, honor, title and power." (February 15, 1559.)
[By this Papal Decree allegiance and loyalty to the Second Vatican Council, a council dishonoring the authentic teaching of the Catholic Church and introducing false doctrine (heresy) into the Church disqualifies one from legitimate succession to the Chair of Peter. Paul IV's Decree marks the V-2 holders of the Holy Office as bogus popes having absolutely no power, dignity, honor or title. Thus no obedience or respect is owed to them.]
1 The idea of Sedevacantism [the Chair is vacant] was developed by good Catholics as a "best guess" theologically for what was discerned happening in the Church during the 1960's and early 1970's when it was realized that the so-called "conciliar popes" could not be true Catholic Popes due to their heretical actions.
As time continued, the position of sedevacantism became less tenable as it is a dogma of Faith (de fide) that "there will always be successors to Peter." The longest vacancy in the Papacy has been seven years.
Dawning realization has come to the Catholic world that what we have is a line of Anti-Popes prophesied by Our Lady of LaSalette - "Rome will lose the faith and become the seat of Antichrist. . . The Church will be in Eclipse. . ."
|
|
|
Pope Eugenius IV, Sept 4, 1439; Vatican Council 4,3
The Pope is supreme on earth, not being subject even to a general council. "The Roman Pontiff is the true Vicar of Christ, the head of the whole Church and the father and teacher of all Christians; and to him was committed in blessed Peter, by our Lord Jesus Christ, the full power of tending, ruling and governing the whole Church." (Ref. Council of Florence, session 6)Any who appeal from the Pope to a general council are liable to excommunication. (Pope Pius IX, October 12, 1869) Therefore, all those who instigated and promulgated the Vatican "II" council are ipso facto (automatically by Decree) excommunicated. |
|
|
THE GATES OF HELL HAVE NOT PREVAILED AGAINST THE CHURCH
Quote:One of the most frequent arguments in favor of the legitimacy of the post-Conciliar establishment is God's promise that "the gates of hell shall not prevail." Implicit in this brief is that is neither possible nor likely that God has abandoned His own. How is one to respond to such an argument?
Let us start with indisputable facts. Whether we believe it or not, and whether it seems possible to us or not, what is abundantly clear is, that after a scandalous Council lacking both regularity and dignity, the Catholic religion has been changed (in the eyes of the world). In the practical order, it has been replaced by another religion, an evolving religion, a religion greatly influenced by Freemasonry and Marxism and inspired throughout by what Popes Pius IX and X clearly rejected under the designation of "Modernism." Having created a "robber" Council that raised a host of errors such as the denial of the Church's "Unity" and Religious Liberty to the level of an infallible teaching, the post-Conciliar "Church" proceeded to abolish the Oath against Modernism and the Holy Office. What other purpose could such measures have than to deprive the Traditional Church - the
Church of All Times - of all her defences? And what followed? The turning of altars into tables, the changing of priests into "presidents," the invalidating of all the sacraments not acceptable to Protestants, the mistranslating of the
Scriptures, and above all, the downgrading of Tabernacles and the destruction of the Mass - "humanist" and demagogic changes of the most serious nature. Cardinal Suenens was correct when he described this as "the French Revolution in the
Catholic Church."
Consider the principle that "by their fruits you shall know them." Now what are the fruits of the new religion? Priests by the thousands have abandoned their calling - of those remaining over 25% requested and were refused permission to
marry. Monks and nuns laicized by the thousands. The seminaries are virtually deserted. The median age for priests in the United States being the late
fifties, with an anticipated drop to 40% of the present level by the end of the decade. Far more tragic: despite the wide range of "liturgies" offered - conservative to radical chic - Catholics by the millions have turned away from the [new] Church and for all practical purposes the youth is no longer interested in what she has to offer. Only 15% of the erstwhile faithful still attend Sunday
[New] Mass and among these communions are up while confessions are down, suggesting that even sin is dwindling away. Over 80% of married Catholics use birth control and do so in the belief that such violates no divine principle, divorce statistics show no difference between Catholics and others; and in the practical realm complete chaos exists with regard to sexual behavior.
Along with all this is the corruption, nay destruction of doctrine and theology. The acceptance of evolution as a fact in every realm - be it biology, theology, sociology - even the Tielhardian thesis that God Himself evolves! The abrogation of canons 1399 and 2318, the refusal of the [new] Church to condemn out and out heretics and the blatant indulgence extended to those who like Hans Kung - their name is legion - would poison the thinking of the faithful are symptomatic of the wide-spread modernist malignancy. The self proclaimed "desacralization" and "demytholization" of the Church combined with the misrepresentation of everything traditional has resulted in an all-pervasive familiarity and vulgarity. Recent attempts to cover this over by dressing the presidents (clergy) and nuns in traditional garb has in no way changed the situation.
Let those who have ears hear. The writing was on the wall from the very opening of the [Vatican "II"] Council. But who of us wished to listen. It's leitmotiv was Aggiornamento, a concept inimical to any religion based on eternal verities and Revelation. Roncalli, alias John XXIII, then declared his intention "to safeguard the sacred deposit of the faith more effectively." It does not take much imagination to understand what he meant - and he did not hesitate to declare that "...the substance of the ancient doctrine contained in the deposit of the faith is one thing, the manner in which it is expressed in another..."
This claim is false and in fact satanic, for it opened the door to all the betrayals and falsifications that followed. The traditional formulations were not superficial luxuries, they were guarantees of the truth and efficacy; they
more then adequately expressed what they wished to say - their adequacy was in fact their raison d'etre. Is not the truth inseparable from its expression? Was it not the strength of the Church that the old expressions were always valid?
They only displeased those who wished to make modernism, scientism, evolutionism and socialism part of the "deposit of the faith."
One must take a phenomena for what it is. If one sees a tiger in the streets of New York one does not require a news broadcast to know that what one sees is a reality. One can deny its existence only at the risk of one's life.
Despite the obvious, there are those who, desiring to have the "best of both worlds," would exculpate the post-Conciliar Church; and who seek to explain why is it that the "smoke of Satan" has all but obscured "the dome of St. Peter's"?
Some claim that it is because the Council and the subsequent innovations were "badly interpreted." But, by whom? Others, loudly proclaiming their loyalty to those usurping the Chair of Peter, claim it is the fault of the bishops and cardinals around him. But who appointed them? Since when has the principle of respondeat superior been abandoned? (Even hell has a hierarchical structure.)
Despite the fact that such claims are often motivated by the desire "to cover Noah's drunkenness," they remain a combination of improbabilities and hypocrisy.
Whether we like it or not, this blame must fall primarily upon the post-conciliar "popes." Even though none of us are without an element of
culpability, it is they who must bear the burden. It is they who approved the Council and the Reforms, and without their approval neither the Council nor the Reforms would have any meaning or authority. It is they who have misapplied the
principles of obedience in order to bring the erstwhile faithful into line. It is they who tolerate every conceivable deviation while condemning out of hand whatever is traditional. They are not individuals who have "fallen into heresy," or who are, as Lefebvre would say, "tainted with modernism." (Can one have a
touch of Pregnancy?) They are much worse, for they are heretics who have been elected precisely because they are heretics; men who, by the laws of the traditional Church have long since excommunicated themselves. And this condemnation applies to virtually the entire "electoral body" responsible for the implementation of what can only be described as a modernist conspiracy. It further applies to the sycophant hierarchy which declares itself una cum those in power.
"And Ciaphus was, in his own mind, a benefactor of mankind" (Blake). To speak of a conspiracy is not to deny the sincerity of those involved. But what heretic has ever lacked sincerity? Nor is it to claim that every individual who lent and lends his support is a conscious subversive. (Thou our Lord did said that he who is not with Him was against Him - not to condemn error is to condone it.) The
net result is clear. The Council and its aftermath was achieved by a conspiracy of individuals who Pope Saint Pius X clearly condemned, and against whom he desired to protect the Church. He went so far as to state, in his capacity as Pope and hence ex cathedra, that any individual who even defended a single modernist proposition condemned by his Encyclicals and Lamentabili was ipso facto and latae sententiae excommunicated - that is, by that very fact and without any need for any one to publicly so declare (Praestantia Scripturae,
Nov. 18, 1907). No father signing the Council documents and no member of the hierarchy accepting and teaching them, can claim to fall outside this
condemnation. Everyone who considers himself "in obedience" to the new Church implicitly accepts its modernist principles.
Consider Religious Liberty - the idea that every man is free to decide for himself what is true and false, what is right and wrong, and that his very human dignity resides in just this licence. Imagine Christ upon the Cross telling us that he came to establish a visible Church - "One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic," and to confide to it those truths necessary for our salvation. He continues however to assure us that we have no obligation to listen to Him. - that we are free to choose for ourselves what we shall believe, and that our real human dignity resides, not in conforming to His image, but in making just such choices! Incredible! And now, some two thousand years later, we find Christ's [seeming] representative whose function it is to teach us what Christ taught us, assuring us that, as a result of Christ's incarnation, all men, even those who reject the very idea of God, are saved, that Christ's Church, through her own fault, has lost her "unity," and that the Crucifixion is but a "witness to man's human dignity" - his ability to determine for himself what is true and false.
Madness reigns supreme!
It will be argued that these false popes have said some nice things. Such however is of no importance or interest in the present situation when we must
decide whether or not they are truly Christ's representatives on earth. If they are truly "one hierarchical person" with our Lord, we must obey them. But Catholics must understand that the Pope's infallibility is totally dependent upon his being himself in obedience to Christ, and that when he rejects Christ and falsifies Christ's teaching, we must reject his authority. As Peter said, "one must obey God rather than man." A modernist pope is an impossibility.
Either he is a modernist and then he isn't a pope, or he is a pope and then he isn't a modernist. All this is not a matter of picking or choosing what we shall believe. It is a matter of being Catholic. To deny this principle is to declare Christ a liar! St. Catherine of Sienna told us that a Pope who falsifies his function will go to hell, and further, that those of us who obey him will go
there with him. Let us be done with those who claim that John Paul II is trying to bring the "Church" back to tradition. The lie is easily exposed. All he has to do is reject Vatican II and restore the traditional sacraments. Short of this he is but a wolf in sheep's clothing pulling the wool over our eyes.
Have the "gates of hell" prevailed?. Certainly not. Catholics know that Christ cannot lie. Let us then examine the meaning of this promise. What it proclaims is that the truth will ultimately win out - though not necessarily so in the "short run." That such is "true" is an intellectual certainty, for error can only be defined in terms of the denial of truth. Now the Catholic Church is true, and hence it can no more be totally destroyed than can the truth itself.
But this Church resides, not in numbers, not in buildings, and not even of necessity in the hierarchy. The truth functions ex opere operatio. It resides in the faithful (the hierarchy must be "of the faithful," before they can be "of
the hierarchy." Or as the theologians put it, members of the "teaching Church" (the Magisterium) must be first of all members of the "learning Church.") Every baptized infant, according to the traditional rite, becomes a "member of the Body of Christ." And what is the Church if not the Body of Christ, the presence of Christ in this world? It follows then that, as Anna-Katrina Emmerick points out, "if there were but one person alive who was truly Catholic, the Church would reside in him."
Visibility is a quality of the Church. Does visibility require a hierarchy. The matter is open to debate, but time has not yet run its course. [No, the matter is not of debate. The Church is visible. God knows His hierarchy; the hierarchy is in force, and wherever they are, there is the Catholic Church faithful.]
In any event traditional bishops are available, and if but one traditional bishop survives, the hierarchy would reside in him. What has to be remembered however is that the Church does not exist for the sake of the hierarchy, it is the hierarchy that exists for the sake of the Church. And history has shown that Catholics can live
and retain the faith for centuries without any hierarchy, [because of their suppression by secular means]. God knows his own and will not abandon them. If a bishop is necessary for the visibility of the Church, He will certainly provide one. Ultimately, it is we who abandon God, His Truth and His Church, and never the other way around.
One would have thought that the changes were more than enough to induce the faithful to revolt. The great surprise, truly apocalyptic, was that the Catholic people did not do so. That they did not only goes to show what "sincere, pious, fervent and well intentioned" Catholics really valued. One is tempted to feel sorry for them, but as always, even in such a situation "God knows his own." One
must insist upon this, for the truly innocent are far less numerous than one is inclined to believe. The argument that it is not possible or likely that God would abandon his own presumes that "his own" did not deserve to be abandoned, when in fact they did deserve it precisely to the degree that they are in fact abandoned.
Why did Catholics not revolt? Well, first of all, many did, but their stand was undermined by poor leadership. Psychologically dependent upon the [false] hierarchy and the clergy, they looked for guidance that was not provided. The Modernists,
working for decades, had prepared the ground, and even those who were not out and out subversives had their faith corrupted and hence weakened. At the Council there were perhaps 70 individuals who - towards the end - began to understand what was happening. No more! And among them not one was willing to take a clear cut stand on solid doctrinal grounds. [except Cardinal Siri who was elected Pope] Even Lefebvre based his opposition on false theological premises, arguing for example that one can disobey a valid pope. [Which, for all purposes, set up a new sect of the conciliar church.]
Secondly, for decades the faithful were both inadequately trained in their faith and discouraged from leading active spiritual lives. Educated in secularized colleges, taught by "liberal" priests, they were by and large modernists without knowing it.
And finally, both clergy and laity found the modern world seductively attractive. They found the rejection and scorn of the modern world - a world which had repudiated the Church and like the Prodigal son, had walked away from the bosom of the Father - increasingly intolerable. They could not accept the disapproval of this world in which they believed more strongly than in Christ. ["I saw a number of people looking quickly right and left, that is, in the direction of the world." - Anna-Katrina Emmerick, 1821]
The Council declared the Church would henceforth not only be "open to the world," but that it would "embrace" it! Its avowed aim and promise was aggiornamento to bring the Church "into the twentieth century" and make it part of, and acceptable to that world. No longer did she roclaim that it was necessary for the Prodigal son to return to the bosom of the Father. Rather, abandoning both her function and her identity, she proclaimed that the Father was obliged to eat the swill fit only for pigs! Both clergy and laity -
exceptions apart - rushed headlong into to the sea to spend their patrimony as if there was no tomorrow. It is this that is at the heart of the conspiracy. It is this that is the crux of the problem. It is this that created the smoke swirling around St. Peter's Basilica. This spark of rebellion, present in the soul of every man, needed only the "winds of change" to create an inferno.
"Men will surrender to the spirit of the age. They will say that if they had lived in our day, Faith would be simple and easy. But in their day, they will say, 'things are complex; the Church must be brought *up-to-date* and made meaningful to the day's problems. When the Church and the World are One, then those days (God's Chastisement) are at hand. Because our Divine Master placed a barrier between His things and the things of the world." - St. Anthony of the Desert, 4th century]
However, as has always been the case throughout the history of the Church, a remnant persisted in retaining the fullness of the faith. The true Church is to be found among those who believe and continue to believe in the manner of their ancestors. It is they who bear witness to the truth of Christ's promise. It is they who provide the proof that "the gates of hell have not prevailed." Not all are profound theologians. Not all are sinless. But they can be recognized by their insistence on true priests, true doctrine, and the true Mass - the Mass of All Times.
Some would accuse traditional Catholics - those that insist on retaining the fullness of the Catholic faith intact and who therefore refuse the new religion of the post-Conciliar Church, of being in "schism." The accusation is a lie. In reality, the schismatic is one who removes himself from the truth, and not one who insists upon it. And if it is necessary to separate oneself from something
in order to save the truth, long live Schism! But in reality, it is not the traditional Catholic who is in Schism, but those who are responsible for
changing the Catholic faith. But let is be both clear and honest. The new Church is not schismatic. It is heretical. In similar manner traditional Catholics are accused of being Protestants because they disobey the pope. Such accusations are false. Traditional Catholics do not "pick and choose" what they wish to believe; they are adhering with all their hearts to what the Church has always taught and always done. Nor are they disobeying the pope. They believe that the pope, being Christ's vicar on earth and "one hierarchical person" with our Lord, is to be obeyed. They know that when Peter speaks he is infallible because it is Christ who speaks through him. They are the out and out papists and are doing nothing less than refusing to disobey Peter. In such a situation they are obliged to
disobey those who falsely speak in Peter's name. To obey modernist and heretical "popes" is to declare that they are "one hierarchical person" with our Lord and hence that Christ teaches falsely - quod absit!... END QUOTE
Ad majorem Dei gloriam.
Rama P. Coomaraswamy, M.D.
|
|
|
Pagan Charlie receiving the Mark of Shiva
|
|
|
Perfidious Charlie in his synagogue ot Satan
|
|
|
Charlie kissing the Godless Antichrist Koran
|
|
|
6 Protestors (Protestants) and a Jew, Jules Isaac with 666 Montini, changed the rest of the Mass at Vatican "II"
|
|
|
666 Montini Tossing Tradition
|
|
|
