|
Antioch typified Antichrist
The False Worship and False Popes of the Conciliar Church As Prefigured in Machabees In the New Testament, Jesus, in response to the very explicit question, "What shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?", and, "Tell us, when shall these things be?" (Matt. 24:3)," gives very explicit answers, contained in what are referred to as the eschatological discourses. Now we hold that some of the forms of our sacraments were given by Christ to the apostles generally, and others "in specie." In the same way it is possible that the signs Jesus enumerates are "general" but it is also possible that one or more of the "signs" are absolutely "specific" in nature.
One of the signs is in Matt 24:15, with the parallel passage in Mark 13:14, "When you therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place: he that readeth, let him understand," is deserving of extreme scrutiny.
Firstly, several conclusions are inescapable:
1. Christ is confirming and certifying Daniel as an authentic prophet.
2. Christ is telling one, if one thinks he is in the last days, to read canonical Daniel, which, for the Catholic includes what the Protestants exclude and refer to as the "Additions to Daniel."
3. The "the abomination of desolation" (whatever that is, for the moment), is an end time sign, and capable of being seen, and it will stand in the "Holy Place" (for the moment, wherever that is).
4. Unless we take Our Lord's statement as unnecessary, the abomination of desolation is a defined thing, otherwise you would have Jesus telling us to look for something that we can't find. Therefore, what precisely we are to look for, the "abomination of desolation," must absolutely be knowable, or if it were not, the statement would, at a minimum, be unnecessary. And that can't be the case. In the divine economy, God would not possibly tell us to watch or look for something that we can't find.
5. The nativity stories of Matthew and Luke each relate facts and events that are not in evidence in the other Gospels. In the same way it would be a mistake to take Christ's statement, "spoken of by Daniel the prophet," as a limiting one; i.e., that the only statements in Sacred Scripture, relating to or permitting us to identify the "abomination of desolation," are contained in Daniel.
6. It is known that the term "abomination of desolation" appears in 1 and 2 Machabees, which are in the Catholic Bible. It is known and has always been held by the Fathers, that Daniel who was carried away in the deportations that preceded Jerusalem's fall to the Babylonians, c. 585 B.C., prophesied the "abomination of desolation" that occurred during the apostasy of the Jews and their hierarchy that began in reality with the ascension to the throne of Antiochus IV Epiphanes in 175 B.C.; and which is recorded in the books of the Machabees. While the command of Christ to read Daniel is [in effect] explicit, I would state that in light of the foregoing it is implicit that Christ is admonishing us to read the Machabees for the selfsame reasons we are told to read Daniel.
7. It is inescapable from the previous statement, that Christ is telling us that Daniel prophesied at least two time periods that would contain the "abomination of desolation"; one at the time of the Machabees, and one in the very last days. I say at least two because there are those that argue that there was a third (by no means certain) at the time of the first Jewish revolt [from] 66 A.D. to 73 A.D.; but that time is not reported in Sacred Scripture whereas the other, the Machabees, is.
8. The next statement relates to, "He that readeth, let him understand" (Mark 13:12; Matt 24:15). What does Christ mean by this?
Our statements in this regard can't be as certain as those that have preceded them. The super majority opinion of Catholic exegetes (those who interpret scripture) over time would, I think, be described as follows:
Christ is telling the reader to look for a hidden fulfillment or replication of the 1st time of the "abomination of desolation ." The end time "abomination" will not replicate exactly the prior one in every' respect but will so substantially resemble the first one as to be recognizable to those who are looking with eyes of FAITH.
9. The 1st "abomination of desolation" comes in a certain context described among other places in 1 and 2 Machabees; but also by Josephus, whose works contain extensive material on the time of the Machabees. It would be a mistake to take Jesus' statement to read Daniel (explicit), and Machabees (implicit) as limited to reading the material only for references to what the "abomination of desolation" is, rather than the entirety of events, persons, etc., that describe the context of the 1st abomination in order to recognize the 2nd at the time of the end.
10. As to the "standing in the Holy Place," or the parallel passage in Mark, "standing where it ought not," we will hold this for later. But I think the answer will be self-evident.
As for the period of the Machabees (implicit), I would recommend to the reader that he study 1 and 2 Machabees, together with all the footnotes in the Challoner Douay-Rheims Bible, 1 and 2 Machabees in the Jerusalem and/or the New Jerusalem Bible together with all the notes, the commentary on the Machabees in the Jerome Biblical Commentary, the two volumes on the Machabees in the Anchor Bible series [Editor's note: See in particular, the unabridged annotations in the 1582 original Douay-Rheims Old and New Testament, and the Haydock Bible]. Drawing on that material I think I can make the following statements:
The "Abomination of Desolation" is an OBJECT: a 2nd altar ERECTED "upon" (1 Machabees 1:57) and "over against" (1 Machabees 1:62) the altar of God, in the Jewish temple, as an integral part of a false and idolatrous worship form introduced in substitution of the true sacrifice, at a general time of apostasy of Jewry from their received faith.
From the adjectives "UPON" and "OVER AGAINST" that are used to describe the placement of the idolatrous 2nd altar, in relation to the true altar, we can discern several things: the shape of the true altar could not simply be horizontal, i.e., a "slab," because then the 2nd altar would have simply been placed "UPON" the original. The words "OVER AGAINST" are the scriptural way of describing two objects being brought in proximity, vertically to one another. Simply put, the "shape" of the 1st altar (the true altar) must have been such that the false altar could be said to be placed both "UPON" (horizontal) and "OVER AGAINST" (in proximity to, on a vertical basis) the original altar.
See the illustration below:
|
Machabees 1:57, 1:62
Some modern texts do not capture or translate the words "upon" and "over against" properly. In this case we believe that Bishop Challoner (whose translation of the Douay-Rheims Bible is used by most English-speaking Catholics) has [in this case, retained the correct translation, from the original 1582 D-R text, of] … St. Jerome's supra, as "upon," and his contra, as "over against." One possible example of the cross sectional shape of the true 1st altar would be a capital "L." If one erected a free standing "TABLE" on the horizontal line of the capital "L" (the original altar) the table could correctly be said to be "UPON" the original altar and also "OVER AGAINST" the original altar, because the original altar has a "VERTICAL" aspect (the vertical line of the capital "L") which the "TABLE'S" (second altar) vertical aspect is in proximity to. To carry the analogy a bit further, the typical cross-sectional pre-conciliar, Roman Rite altar could be described as the original capital "L" of our example, with a few further modifications: the bottom horizontal line of the "L" is very long and we add to the top of the vertical line of the "L" a horizontal "CAP" [serif] or line. Why so? The horizontal "CAP" [serif] of the vertical line of the capital "L" is the area on which rests (rested) the tabernacle, and on which the priest offered the unbloody sacrifice, and the vertical line of the "L" is the leading vertical edge of that part of the "ALTAR." But where does the long horizontal line of the capital "L" come from?In the Roman Rite, the so-called "altar rail" separates the altar from the rest of the Church. When you step on the other side of the altar rail, you are literally on the altar. The "iconostas" (icon screen separating altar from main body of Church) in the Oriental rites of the Church is functionally performing exactly the same function in the "EAST" as the altar rail did in the "WEST," separating the altar from the rest of the Church. Further proof that the area between the altar rail and vertical leading edge of the "altar" is also the "altar": when someone comes to the rectory inquiring over the whereabouts of Father "X," some of us reply, "he's on the altar"! Now is he standing on the horizontal plane on which the tabernacle rests? Obviously not. But nonetheless, we say "he's on the altar," he is in fact standing in the aforementioned area set apart by the altar rail.
Now, if as part of a new cult and worship form, you erect a "table" (read 2nd altar) between the vertical edge of the original altar and the altar rail, for the 1st and only time in Catholic history, you will have replicated the abomination of desolation in the Machabees; for the Table in the Novus Ordo is directly "upon" (1 Machabees 1:57) the true Roman Rite altar, because it sits on top of the horizontal plane of the altar; and "over against" (1 Machabees 1:62) the true Roman Rite altar, because the table stands in proximity to the vertical aspect of the altar.
Returning to the Machabees, we are told that the time period of the persecution and apostasy began with the commencement of the reign of Antiochus "in the year 137" (1 Machabees 1:11). We know from Babylonian archival material that Antiochus began to reign "in the sixth month" of the seleucid year 137. The persecution period ended with the death of Simon, the last of five sons (the Machabees) of the priest of Modin, "in the 11th month of the year 177" (1 Machabees 16:14). So the period of persecution lasted some 40 years and five months. It is worthy of note, I think, to mention at this point, that Christ in the eschatological discourse says: "This generation will not pass away…" A biblical generation is known to be reckoned as 40 years long. Anyone familiar with the existing material (which is clearly pre-Christian) of the Essene sect of the Jews knows that it speaks constantly of the last battle in the history of the world, being 40 years long.
In a prophecy about the last days, Saint Bridget of Sweden, known to have the prophetic charism, states that the last battle in the history of the world will be forty years long. Further, she makes the following incredible prophesy:
"In the year 1980 the wicked will prevail. They will sacrilegiously profane and defile the churches by erecting in them altars to idols and to Anti-Christ, whom they will worship and attempt to force others to do the same."
I wonder what that could be? Whatever it is, it is now in our past. Of note is the fact that my "Catholic" Almanac reports that the "Apostolic Constitution" on the Novus Ordo Missae was signed by Paul VI on April 3,1969 (which was Passover in that year) and that the Novus Ordo was made mandatory in its final form on December 1, 1974. Now our current reckoning has a strange anomaly; there is no year "0." We proceed directly and immediately from December 31, 1 B.C. to January 1, 1 A.D. Which is to say, that B.C. events are 1 year less removed from us than the sum total of the two integers. The majority opinion on the year of Christ's birth is that it occurred 2 to 3 years prior to Herod the Great's death. The date of Herod's death is one of the most certain in all of antiquity, owing to Josephus, who states that it took place in the 36th year of Herod's reign, contemporaneously (at the same time) with a lunar eclipse visible from Jerusalem; which event was followed closely by a Passover. The date of that eclipse and Herod's death is Tuesday March 13, 4 B.C., at about 1:28 A.M. (Julian Calendar). Further, the triple conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn, in the constellation of Pisces in 7 B.C., is understood by the majority of the scholarly community to meet Matthew's account of the "star" of Bethlehem. This would place the 1980th anniversary of the NATIVITY in our year 1974 A.D. Interesting ... at least, for some of us who still have regard for private revelation.
For those into detail, the evidence is that "Dennis the Little" who is responsible for giving us our present year reckoning, intended to make year "1" of the Christian era the first full year following the year that saw the event of the Nativity of Christ. If the year 7 B.C. was the year that indeed contained the event of the Nativity, 6 B.C. would be the year that Dennis intended (although he didn't accomplish it) to be year 1, and December 31, 1974, would be the end of the year of Christ 1980. There are some versions of the aforementioned prophecy of Saint Bridget that start with, "In the year of Christ 1980..." as though Saint Bridget was drawing a distinction between the true year 1980 and our year 1980, which are not the same.
But, returning to the period of the Machahees, the Jews tire of being set apart and desire to be like the pagans around them. While having religious liberty from their pagan overlords, they willingly forfeit that liberty and ask to be made a pagan city, complete with idolatrous worship. We are talking about what is called religious syncretism. "Jews themselves were in the forefront of the syncretism… They changed their constitution, which constituted an abandonment of their covenant with Yahweh… The Holy of Holies ceased being a CENTRAL part of Jewish worship." The Holy of Holies, by the way, was known to be associated with the Divine presence, known as the Shekinah, which was almost sacramental in nature. Similarly, our tabernacles, which contained the Divine Presence in a sacramental manner, were, in the post-Vatican II period, removed from their central locations on our altars. In many cases they were moved to the side, and some were even placed in the sacristy.
"At no time in Jewish history were women involved in Jewish liturgical practices except at the time of the 'Abomination of Desolation'; and then, they were all over the altar."
The renegade or apostate Jews fortified and occupied the City of David in Jerusalem, which they made their citadel, or ACRA. "The City of David, at the time of the Machabees, was known to occupy THE LARGE WESTERN HILL." Because this is a central point, I would refer the reader to confirm this for himself in either the Jerusalem or the New Jerusalem Bible; both of which contain a footnote on the city of David: "The district called at that time the City of David occupied Jerusalem's western hill." The adjective "large" for the western hill appears in the more extensive commentaries on the subject.
Now the Fathers held that the possibility exists that the fact that there are various texts of some of the books of the Bible may indeed be a product of Divine providence. The book of Daniel comes down to us in two forms, the Greek and Masoretic, or Hebrew. They are not identical. The Masoretic text of Daniel 9:27 has a critical difference between that of the Greek. It states that the "Abomination of Desolation" will be on a "wing of the temple."
"And on the wing of the Temple will be the disastrous abomination" (Dan. 9:27).
Now, St. Hilary, doctor of the Church, in his discourses on 2 Thessalonians chapter 2, and the Anti-Christ (which we will return to later), states that the "Temple of God" (2 Thessalonians 2:4) is clearly the Church. But what about the "WING"? Could it be that the "Abomination of Desolation," which will be seen in the Church, will only be in a portion of the Church, the "New Jerusalem", and if so what portion?
The word "WING" was used by the ancients in much the same way as we use it. The west WING of a hospital, for example. Only one scriptural citation is necessary to prove the point. ..".and the right WING of his army with them" (1 Machabees 9:1).
Now the renegade and apostate Jews made the City of David, which occupied the LARGE WESTERN HILL in Jerusalem, their Citadel. Isn't it interesting that the New Mass, which has a table, a 2nd altar as an integral part of its worship, is only present in the Roman Rite: which is the large western portion (fully 98%) of Catholicism, as distinct from the Eastern or Oriental WING, which still uses its old sacramental forms, including the MASS, and no new 2nd altar?
Four False High Priests - Four False Popes?
What of the Jewish Hierarchy at the time of the Machabees? Onius III is the last apparent and VALID high priest at the time of the apostasy. He is succeeded by his brother, Jason, who procures the office of the High Priesthood by fraud (2 Machabees 4:6-8); and who begins the religious syncretism (2 Machabees 4:9-13). He is known, according to the author of the two volume series on the Machabees ("Anchor Bible"), as the equivalent of "King Johnny." He also introduces the wearing of the "broad brimmed petasos" (a hat). The author of 2 Machabees (remember inspiration and inerrancy) says that Jason was "an impious wretch and no priest" (2 Machabees 4:13). Jason is followed by Menelaus who also acquires the High Priesthood by fraud (2 Machabees 4:23-25). Moreover, Menelaus introduces the "imposed cult," a false sacrifice, with the assistance of the secular arm of King Antiochus, who enforces the false sacrifice. Therefore, the second false High Priest of the four, Menelaus, imposes the false sacrifice. Menelaus is succeeded by his brother, Lysimachus, who reigns very briefly and dies a violent death: "and as for the sacrilegious fellow, they slew him beside the treasury" (2 Machabees 4:42). Some translations say: "they slew him over the treasury." Menelaus resumes his "priesthood," but is ultimately slain (2 Machabees 13:7). He is said to be a "sacrilegious wretch," a "transgressor of the law" (2 Machabees 13:6-7). "He had committed many sins against the Altar of God" (2 Machabees 13:8).
The last of these four false High Priests is Alcimus, who in some respects is the most dangerous of the lot because his act is the best. He obtains the appointment as reported in 2 Machabees 14:3-4; but he had "willfully defiled himself in the time of the mingling with the heathens, seeing that there was no safety for him, nor access to the altar" (2 Machabees 14:3). Bishop Challoner,… [in one of the few instances where he does not delete the annotations from the original D-R Bible], states that Alcimus, "for his apostasy here mentioned, was incapable of the High Priesthood...as Menelaus had been before him...yet, neither of them was truly High Priest... mingling with heathens, that is, in their idolatrous worship" (2 Machabees 14:3).
Alcimus is an apostate, one of the renegade Jews. "And there came to him the wicked and ungodly men of Israel: and Alcimus was at the head of them, who desired to be made high priest" (1 Machabees 7:5). He is at the HEAD of the wicked and ungodly of Israel, and procures the office from the hand of DEMETRIUS; an office which he cannot hold because of his apostasy. I said that he was the best act of the lot. The author of the Anchor Bible Series reports that he has the people of Israel so "conned," that he is referred to by them as " Alcimus the Pious."
It is not my intention to write a commentary on the Machabees; but merely to point out certain parallels with our own age. The syncretism begins with the election of Angelo Roncalli, who takes the name John XXIII. He reports, after his election, and with sarcasm, that his file has been marked "suspected modernist," as though this were a big joke. Pope Saint Pius X calls Modernism "The Synthesis of All Heresies." In the magazine, "30 Days" [March 1994], the head of the Italian Freemasons proclaimed that John XXIII was one of their number - an active member! The Grand Master of the Grand Orient of Italy stated: "As for that, it seems that John XXIII was initiated (into a Masonic Lodge) in Paris and participated in the work of the Istanbul Workshops." I have also seen a sworn affidavit of one of Cardinal Roncalli's (John XXIII's) French Government bodyguards, assigned to protect him during the years when he was in France in an official Vatican capacity. He swears that he escorted Roncalli to the Masonic Lodge with great frequency. Now I ask, how does someone who is outside the community (membership in Freemasonry and subject to automatic excommunication) HEAD THE COMMUNITY [of the faithful]? A contradiction in terms.
It may be mere coincidence, but just as Jason (1st false High Priest in the Machabees), nicknamed "King Johnny" (from the commentary in the Anchor Bible series) introduced the wearing of the broad brimmed hat, does anyone remember John XXIII and the "sombrero" hat he started wearing?
The [Two] Periods of "The Abomination of Desolation"
1st Abomination
Four False High Priests
1.) Jason.
- Introduces the wearing of a "broad brimmed petasos."
- The apostasy and the syncretism explode during his reign nicknamed "King Johnny."
- Acquires the high-priesthood by fraud.
2.) Menelaus
- Acquires the high priesthood by fraud.
- Second false high priest of four.
- Imposes the abomination of desolation, which is a false sacrifice, an integral part of which is a second altar "upon and over against" the altar of God (1 Machabees. 1:57,62).
2nd Abomination
Four False Popes
1.) John XXIII
- Frequently wore a "broad brimmed hat" the apostasy and the syncretism explode during his reign starting with Vatican II.
- Named John.
- Anti-Catholic ideas and his membership in Freemasonry made his papal election a fraud.
2.) Paul VI
- Fraudulently elected (developed later)
- Second "pope" of four who are apostates.
- Imposes the abomination of desolation, which is the New Mass, an integral part of which is a table or second altar "upon and over against" the Roman Rite altar, the altar of God
3.) Lysimachus
- Reigns very briefly and is murdered.
over the treasury (2 Machabees. 4:42)
- Is the third false high priest of four.
4.) Alcimus
- The last of the false high priests.
- Convinces everyone that he is pious.
- The most dangerous of the lot.
- Mingles with the heathens (2 Machabees 14:3)
* The apostate Jews and the abomination of desolation occupied the "Large Western Wing" of the city.
3.) John Paul I
- Reigns for only a month and is, according to many, murdered over the Vatican Bank.
- The third "pope" of the apostasy.
4.) John Paul II
- The fourth [& last?] of the apostate "popes."
- Convinces everyone that he is "Mary's Pope." - The most deceptive and charismatic of the lot.
- Mingles with every pagan religion on earth.
* The apostate Catholics and the abomination of desolation occupy the Large Western Wing of the Church, the Roman Rite; as opposed to Eastern Rites, which don't have the New Mass.
Note: In the first abomination, starting with Jason, none of these men were true High Priests (2 Machabees. 4:13); they obtained the office by fraud and/or were incapable of the High Priesthood due to their apostasy (2 Machabees. -14:3, Douay-Rheims note). Similarly, the four "popes" of the current apostasy obtained their office by fraud and/or are incapable of the High Priesthood (pontificate) due to their public heresy (Canon 188.4, 1917 Code of Canon Law). They are Anti-Popes.
In the same scriptural note (2 Machabees. 14:3), Challoner explains how the true High Priesthood lay with the Machabees: "…the true high priesthood was amongst the Machabees, who were also of the stock of Aaron, and had strictly held their religion, and were ordained according to the rites commanded in the laws of Moses." The Machabees held strictly to the traditional faith, and ordained men according to the Traditional Rite.
|
FALSE WORSHIP
"Therefore when you shall see "the abomination of desolation", which was spoken of by Daniel the Prophet, standing in the holy place (he that readeth, let him understand)..." - Jesus Christ Our Lord and Saviour Redeemer "...and there shall be in the temple the abomination of desolation: and even to the consummation and to the end shall the desolation endure." - Daniel 9:27 "And from the time (f) when the continual sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination to desolation shall be set up, a thousand two hundred ninety days." - Daniel 12:11
"The fifteenth day of the month Casleu, the hundreth five and fourtieth year King Antiochus (l) built the abominable idol of desolation upon the altar of God, and throughout all the cities of Iuda round about they builded altars:...And the five and twentieth day of the month they sacrificed upon the altar that was against the altar..." - 1Machabees 1:57, 1:62
(f) "From the taking away of the day the sacrifice, and placing of abomination (to wit the practice of heresy) to desolation that is, abolishing so much as is possible the Holy Sacrifice of Mass, to the end of that persecution shall be 1290 days..." (footnotes, Annotations of the Douay Fathers, Second Tome of the Holy Bible, 1609)
(l) "Daniel's prophecie.ch.9 was here in part fulfilled, as in a figure, & our Saviour confirmeth it.Mat.24 of Antichrist setting up abomination of desolation in the holy place."
|
Saint Michael The Archangel!
"and behold Michael one of the chief Princes came to aid me..." - Daniel 10:13, 21 For Exorcism, Strength, and Restoration of the True Worship Universal and Destruction of the False Worship in Many Places
"O Glorious Archangel St. Michael, Prince of the heavenly host, be our defense in the terrible warfare which we carry on against principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, spirits of evil. Come to the aid of man, whom God created immortal, made in His own image and likeness, and redeemed at a great price from the tyranny of the devil.
Fight this day the battle of the Lord, together with the holy angels, as already thou hast fought the leader of the proud angels, Lucifer, and his apostate host, who were powerless to resist thee, nor was there place for them any longer in heaven. That cruel, that ancient serpent, who is called the devil or Satan who seduces the whole world, was cast into the abyss with his angels. Behold, this primeval enemy and slayer of men has taken courage. Transformed into an angel of light, he wanders about with all the multitude of wicked spirits, invading the earth in order to blot out the name of God and of His Christ, to seize upon, slay and cast into eternal perdition souls destined for the crown of eternal glory. This wicked dragon pours out, as a most impure flood, the venom of his malice on men of depraved mind and corrupt heart, the spirit of lying, of impiety, of blasphemy, and the pestilent breath of impurity, and of every vice and iniquity. These most crafty enemies have filled and inebriated with gall and bitterness the Church, the spouse of the immaculate Lamb, and have laid impious hands on her most sacred possessions. In the Holy Place itself, where has been set up the See of the most holy Peter and the Chair of Truth for the light of the world, they have raised the throne of their abominable impiety, with the iniquitous design that when the Pastor has been struck, the sheep may be scattered.
Arise then, O invincible Prince, bring help against the attacks of the lost spirits to the people of God, and give them the victory. They venerate thee as their protector and patron; in thee holy Church glories as her defense against the malicious power of hell; to thee has God entrusted the souls of men to be established in heavenly beatitude. Oh, pray to the God of peace that He may put Satan under our feet, so far conquered that he may no longer be able to hold men in captivity and harm the Church. Offer our prayers in the sight of the Most High, so that they may quickly conciliate the mercies of the Lord; and beating down the dragon, the ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, do thou again make him captive in the abyss, that he may no longer seduce the nations. Amen.
V. Behold the Cross of the Lord; be scattered ye hostile powers.
R. The Lion of the tribe of Juda has conquered the root of David.
V. Let Thy mercies be upon us, O Lord.
R. As we have hoped in Thee.
V. O Lord, hear my prayer.
R. And let my cry come unto Thee.
Let us pray.
O God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, we call upon Thy holy Name, and as supplicants we implore Thy clemency, that by the intercession of Mary, ever Virgin Immaculate and our Mother, and of the glorious Archangel St. Michael, Thou wouldst deign to help us against Satan and all other unclean spirits, who wander about the world for the injury of the human race and the ruin of souls. Amen."
Prayer of exorcism, Pope Leo XIII, Roman Raccolta, July 23, 1898, supplement approved 31-7-1902. Burnes, Oates & Washbourne Ltd. of London, official publishers to the Holy See, 1935. twelfth edition.
|
TRUE WORSHIP
|
FALSE WORSHIP OF PAGANISM
Karol Wojtyla engaging in anti-Catholic worship at Assisi |
"...and He is become their Savior..." - Isaiah 63:8
THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE |
Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on us!
"In the end, My Immaculate Heart will Triumph" - Queen of the Most Holy Rosary |
|
|
